2006
DOI: 10.2140/agt.2006.6.2313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The algebraic crossing number and the braid index of knots and links

Abstract: It has been conjectured that the algebraic crossing number of a link is uniquely determined in minimal braid representation. This conjecture is true for many classes of knots and links.The Morton-Franks-Williams inequality gives a lower bound for braid index. And sharpness of the inequality on a knot type implies the truth of the conjecture for the knot type.We prove that there are infinitely many examples of knots and links for which the inequality is not sharp but the conjecture is still true. We also show t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some indications to this effect, at least for what concerns the first entry of the complexity function of [4], that is, the braid index. In fact, it is shown in [56] (see also [38]) that the braid index of the n-cabling of a link L is n-times the braid index of L, so the n-cabling of a minimal braid for L is a minimal braid for the n-cabling of L. Also, by [38], if the Jones conjecture holds for L, it also holds for its cabled versions. The question of whether this property of the braid index extends to the rest of the complexity function of [4] depends on the Seifert surface of the cabled link and its braid foliations.…”
Section: Homology 3-spheresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are some indications to this effect, at least for what concerns the first entry of the complexity function of [4], that is, the braid index. In fact, it is shown in [56] (see also [38]) that the braid index of the n-cabling of a link L is n-times the braid index of L, so the n-cabling of a minimal braid for L is a minimal braid for the n-cabling of L. Also, by [38], if the Jones conjecture holds for L, it also holds for its cabled versions. The question of whether this property of the braid index extends to the rest of the complexity function of [4] depends on the Seifert surface of the cabled link and its braid foliations.…”
Section: Homology 3-spheresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is well know, see [1], that the closure of a braid B gives a transverse link in the standard tight contact structure on S 3 and moreover its self-linking number is a(B) − n(b) where a(B) is the algebraic length of B and n(B) is the braid index of B. Thus the Bennequin inequality can be written To state our result for minimal braid index representatives of (strongly) quasi-positive knots we recall a conjecture of K. Kawamuro, [21]. Given a link type L with braid index b > 0 is there an integer w such that any braid B whose closure is in the link type L satisfies…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sharpness is known for closures of positive braids that contain a full right handed twist [13] and for alternating fibered links [23]. It is known that the MFW-inequality is not always sharp, but it is still unknown if the Braid Geography Conjecture is true or not; however, in [21] it was shown that the class of links for which the Braid Geography Conjecture is true is closed under cabling and connected sums. Theorem 1.14.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it contains infinitely many four tuples (x, y, z, w) where the MFW inequality is not sharp [8].…”
Section: On K and Its Mirror Image K The Mfw-inequality Is Not Sharmentioning
confidence: 99%