2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000187034.58955.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) as a Screening Tool for Excessive Drinking in Primary Care: Reliability and Validity of a French Version

Abstract: The AUDIT questionnaire remains a good screening instrument for French-speaking primary care.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
256
3
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 347 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
256
3
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In two studies that were performed in primary healthcare settings in Spain, the results were slightly lower for sensitivity (81.4% and 89.1%) and very close to ours as regards specificity (91.1% and 94.6%) (11,22). In one other similar study that was carried out in three Frenchspeaking areas, the results concerning detection of hazardous drinkers were lower than ours (AUDIT ]7 for males: sensitivity 83.5%, specificity 79.9%; AUDIT ]6 for females: sensitivity 81.2%, specificity 93.7%) (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In two studies that were performed in primary healthcare settings in Spain, the results were slightly lower for sensitivity (81.4% and 89.1%) and very close to ours as regards specificity (91.1% and 94.6%) (11,22). In one other similar study that was carried out in three Frenchspeaking areas, the results concerning detection of hazardous drinkers were lower than ours (AUDIT ]7 for males: sensitivity 83.5%, specificity 79.9%; AUDIT ]6 for females: sensitivity 81.2%, specificity 93.7%) (23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Organisation [35] and designed to identify alcohol consumption risk have been tested and validated [36]. Gordon et al [28] has used this AUDIT-C questionnaire to identify drinkers with a level of risk in a large sample consumption in general practice.…”
Section: Audit-cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rumpf et al 31 assumem como ponto de corte para a população alemã ≥ 5, assim como Bischof et al 32 . Daeppen et al 33 , bem como Gache et al 34 , indicam o ponto de corte 6. Giang et al 35 encontraram 81,8% de sensibilidade e 76,1% de especificidade no ponto de corte ≥ 7, da mesma forma como sugerido no presente estudo (com 76,4% de sensibilidade e 75% de especificidade).…”
Section: (N = 340)unclassified
“…No estudo de Daeppen et al 33 , a área foi de 0,77. Bush et al 38 , registraram uma área de 0,81 sob a curva ROC, enquanto Gache et al 34 encontraram uma área de 0,91. Reinert & Allen 39 , revisando os estudos de validação do AUDIT, apontam que as áreas sob a curva ROC têm variado entre 0,74 e 0,99, de forma que a área encontrada no presente estudo encontra-se compatível com outros estudos de validação.…”
Section: (N = 340)unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation