2008
DOI: 10.1108/03074350810849305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The alchemy of acquisition currency: exclusive advantages of listed companies

Abstract: Purpose -Acquisition currency is the possibility, enjoyed mainly by listed companies, of paying for acquisitions with paper (i.e. with conversion shares) instead of financial means, decreasing the participating share of the controlling shareholder as little as possible. The paper seeks to address the issues. Design/methodology/approach -The paper describes an original model to deal with the conceptual framework of the problem. Findings -The acquisition currency game is interesting and it is worth playing it. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, cross‐listing enhances the firm's visibility in the host country where the firm is planning expansion via mergers and acquisitions and provides the firm with an acquisition currency, a foreign exchange‐listed security that is valid in the foreign country to pay for acquisitions in that country[14]. Empirically, there is evidence that non‐US firms cross‐listed in the USA are significantly more active in acquiring US firms (Tolmunen and Torstila, 2005; Tagliavini, 2008) and, compared to their domestically listed peers, pay less by using US‐listed equity rather than cash (Burns, 2004).…”
Section: Motives To Cross‐listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, cross‐listing enhances the firm's visibility in the host country where the firm is planning expansion via mergers and acquisitions and provides the firm with an acquisition currency, a foreign exchange‐listed security that is valid in the foreign country to pay for acquisitions in that country[14]. Empirically, there is evidence that non‐US firms cross‐listed in the USA are significantly more active in acquiring US firms (Tolmunen and Torstila, 2005; Tagliavini, 2008) and, compared to their domestically listed peers, pay less by using US‐listed equity rather than cash (Burns, 2004).…”
Section: Motives To Cross‐listmentioning
confidence: 99%