2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The albino chick as a model for studying ocular developmental anomalies, including refractive errors, associated with albinism

Abstract: Albinism is associated with a variety of ocular anomalies including refractive errors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the ocular development of an albino chick line. The ocular development of both albino and normally pigmented chicks was monitored using retinoscopy to measure refractive errors and high frequency A-scan ultrasonography to measure axial ocular dimensions. Functional tests included an optokinetic nystagmus paradigm to assess visual acuity, and flash ERGs to assess retinal function. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the effects of form deprivation treatments, refractive errors and axial ocular dimensions were measured using static retinoscopy and high-frequency A-Scan ultrasonography respectively, under gaseous anesthesia (1.5% isoflurane in oxygen) in both cases (Rymer et al, 2007). Refractive errors are expressed as spherical equivalent errors (SER), i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the effects of form deprivation treatments, refractive errors and axial ocular dimensions were measured using static retinoscopy and high-frequency A-Scan ultrasonography respectively, under gaseous anesthesia (1.5% isoflurane in oxygen) in both cases (Rymer et al, 2007). Refractive errors are expressed as spherical equivalent errors (SER), i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying genetic abnormality, which is expressed as an inability to synthesize melanin in ocular and extraocular tissues, is presumed to be responsible for the latter abnormalities (either directly or indirectly) and may be directly responsible for observed refractive errors. [17] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considering that the diameter of the fOCT imaging beam is 2.5 mm at the cornea and the diameter of the naturally dark dilated chicken pupil was between 3 and 3.5 mm, it is likely that the observed slow changes in the retinal layer reflectivity are due to vignetting of the imaging beam resulting from stimulus-induced pupil constriction and subsequent dilation. According to previously published research, [19][20][21] visually evoked pupil constriction in chickens begins ∼100 ms after the stimulus onset and occurs more rapidly than the subsequent dilation. The pupil dynamics timing and behavior described by Barbur et al 21 match well with the changes observed in the slow IOSs from the choroid (pale blue line in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3(a) shows that the a-wave (the negative peak of the ERG trace) appears ∼15 ms after the visual stimulus onset, which correlates well with previous ERG studies in living chicken retina and indicates normal photoreceptor function. 19,20 The corresponding IOSs measured in the inner retinal layers, from the NFL to the ONL, show very small (∼1% to 5%) positive changes and peak between 27 ms and 33 ms post-flash onset, which appear to correlate with the end of the steep rise of the b-wave (the positive peak in the ERG recording). Furthermore, these IOSs show a subsequent decrease in reflectivity, with minima between 67 ms and 73 ms after stimulus onset for the individual inner retinal layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%