2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10624-013-9304-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The AKP’s engagement with Turkey’s past crimes: an analysis of PM Erdoğan’s “Dersim apology”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It defined itself at the time against the oppressive Turkish state tradition (epitomized as the deep state), creating “the myth of the government against the state” (Günay , 180). Key in this moment was the public recognition, for the first time, of past massacres and disasters—even if in limited, hesitant, and highly convoluted forms (Ayata and Hakyemez ). At the same time, the AKP's selective critique of state violence and past massacres fortified the promise of peace among Kurds and provided further legitimacy (and electoral support) to the government (notwithstanding the ongoing state violence): Islamists claimed to be the victims of the same secular state tradition that oppressed the Kurds.…”
Section: The Work Of Remembering: On Politics Of History and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It defined itself at the time against the oppressive Turkish state tradition (epitomized as the deep state), creating “the myth of the government against the state” (Günay , 180). Key in this moment was the public recognition, for the first time, of past massacres and disasters—even if in limited, hesitant, and highly convoluted forms (Ayata and Hakyemez ). At the same time, the AKP's selective critique of state violence and past massacres fortified the promise of peace among Kurds and provided further legitimacy (and electoral support) to the government (notwithstanding the ongoing state violence): Islamists claimed to be the victims of the same secular state tradition that oppressed the Kurds.…”
Section: The Work Of Remembering: On Politics Of History and Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paralleling this, the AKP government had promoted a multiculturalist discourse and rhetorical retribution about the past injustices towards the Kurdish population, until the collapse of the peace process in the summer of 2015 after the general elections in June. Tayyip Erdoğan, as the then-prime minister, even uttered a semi-apology speech about the 1938 Massacre in 2011 in an official party meeting, which put the sole blame on the CHP, as the founding party of the Turkish Republic, rather than the state itself for this atrocity (Ayata and Hakyemez, 2013).…”
Section: Festival Politics and Internal Contestationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurds are a 'non-state nation' (Mojab 2001), spanning territories in Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran, where they have been variously subjected to genocide in a long history of denial of their Kurdish identity (Ayata and Hakyemez 2013;Skutnabb-Kangas and Fernandes 2008). Kurdish identity in Turkey, or what many Kurds claim as North Kurdistan (Keles 2015), has been highly contested, making it difficult or even illegal to claim Kurdish identity throughout long periods of the republic's history (McDowall 2007;Keles 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%