2010
DOI: 10.1080/03081061003643788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The airline perturbation problem: considering disrupted passengers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aircraft arcs found in the LNS solution form a set X n ¼ fði; j; f Þ: ði; jÞ A A; f A F and x ijf ¼ 1g. Therefore, the assignment constraints (15) can be replaced with…”
Section: Multi-commodity Flow Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The aircraft arcs found in the LNS solution form a set X n ¼ fði; j; f Þ: ði; jÞ A A; f A F and x ijf ¼ 1g. Therefore, the assignment constraints (15) can be replaced with…”
Section: Multi-commodity Flow Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraints (13) and (14) impose the airport capacity limit. Constraints (15) assign each flight arc to at most one aircraft. Constraints (16) and (17) are the passenger flow conservation constraints.…”
Section: Mixed Integer Linear Programming Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraint contains that the number of reassigned passengers do not exceed the aircraft capacity, and each passenger would be assigned to a recovery scheme. [9]for solving aircrafts recovery problem considering passengers. The aircraft rotation is the object of their study and it reduces the size of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having in mind that connecting passengers are almost three times more likely to be disrupted than originating ones, by missing their connecting flights they will be often re-accommodated on their best possible, but rather on the best available itineraries, assuming that each recovery itinerary must operationally be feasible while all its flight-legs operated [7]. This is made by applying the Passenger Recovery Plan which is based on the necessity to reassign disrupted passengers to alternative itineraries, commencing at the location after their available times and terminating at their destination or a location nearby [9]. Enabling also the minimum connecting time (MCT) achievable for getting the followup-flight(s), airlines may apply various policies for the passenger recovering such as: (i) unranked or first-disrupted-first-recovered policy, or (ii) ranked where the passengers are recovered in order of decreasing fare-class-value (the most valuable first), or in order of decreasing FFPs-status (FFP-members first) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%