The Air We Breathe: Social determinants of smoking among parents with infants

Abstract

Objectives : To estimate the smoking prevalence among parents of infants and examine these parents' socio‐demographic characteristics. Method : The sample of all parents of infants (669 mother‐father pairs, 90 single parents) was derived from the 1995 Australian Health Survey. Data were collected by face‐to‐face interview in the respondent's home. Socio‐demographic measures include parent's age, family structure, age‐left‐school, highest post‐school qualification, occupation, and family income. Results : The overall rate of smoking among parents was 28.9% (mothers 24.7%, fathers 33.7%). The lowest rate was observed among mothers with a post‐school tertiary qualification (7.6%) and the highest among fathers aged 18–24 (49.0%). In 15.4% of two‐parent families both parents smoked, but this rate differed markedly by family income (9.9% vs. 29.7% for high and low‐income families respectively). Multiple logistic regression showed that parents who smoked were more likely to be young, minimally educated, employed in blue‐collar occupations, and resident in low‐income families. Conclusions and implications : Infants in this sample who were exposed to parental smoking were likely to be at increased risk of experiencing higher mortality and morbidity for childhood conditions related to passive smoking; more likely to experience adverse health consequences in adulthood; and may themselves take up smoking in later life. The study results pose serious challenges to our tobacco control efforts and health interventions more generally. No single policy or strategy can adequately address the problem of parental smoking. We need macro/upstream approaches that deal with the degree of social and economic inequality in society, as well as more intermediate approaches that intervene at the level of communities, families and individuals.

Measuring socio-economic position in dietary research: is choice of socio-economic indicator important?

“…For the purposes of this study, the original nine-level ASCO was re-coded into three categories: managers and professionals (managers and administrators, professionals and associate professionals); white-collar employees (clerical, sales and service); and blue-collar workers (trades, production workers, labourers). In other studies, this three-level indicator has been shown clearly to discriminate between occupation groups in terms of a range of health and social outcomes 32,33 . An additional category, 'not in the labour force', was also created and included the retired, persons doing home duties on a full-time basis, the unemployed, those unable to work and students.…”

Effectiveness of ototopical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media in Aboriginal children: a community‐based, multicentre, double‐blind randomised controlled trial

“…While only 0.5% of the general Australian population had seven or more people resident in 3‐bedroom dwellings in 1996, 31 this was the norm for 54% of our children. The proportion passively exposed to cigarette smoke (68.5%) is also much higher than smoking prevalence among parents of infants in the general population (28.9%) 32 . These data underscore the need to address economic, social and environmental inequities faced by the Aboriginal population.…”

An exploratory study of control of smoking in the home to reduce infant exposure to environmental tobacco smoke

“…However, our sample was older and had higher education and income level than might be expected in the general population of smoking women. Young maternal age, lower socioeconomic status, and lower maternal education level have been reported to be predictors of smoking (Beck et al, 2002;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], 2001;Turrell, Battistutta, & McGuffog, 2002).…”