1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-3236-3_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The aim is laziness in a data-parallel language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1996
1996
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike our earlier work, we use the BMF as is-all the operations presented here can be interpreted as though they were being expressed on lists. This stance contradicts an earlier paper (Hill, 1993a) in which we said that lists were unsuitable for data-parallel evaluation in a non-strict language. We still believe this to be true, but we have tried to sugar the pill somewhat.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike our earlier work, we use the BMF as is-all the operations presented here can be interpreted as though they were being expressed on lists. This stance contradicts an earlier paper (Hill, 1993a) in which we said that lists were unsuitable for data-parallel evaluation in a non-strict language. We still believe this to be true, but we have tried to sugar the pill somewhat.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…As we have already mentioned, a parallel fold has O(log N ) time complexity, if the function being folded is O(1) and associative. Whenever and the initial state of the for-loop form a monoid ( and x form a monoid if is associative and has x as its left and right identity), then by the first duality theorem (Bird and Wadler, 1988) the fold-left can be safely transformed into a fold-right, or more interestingly a parallel O(log N ) fold (Hill, 1993a).…”
Section: Parallelizing Simple Loopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation