48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The AIAA Code Verification Project - Test cases for CFD Code Verification

Abstract: This paper presents a collection of fluid mechanics problems with exact solutions which can be used to verify the numerical accuracy of solutions obtained by CFD codes. This document is a product of the AIAA Committee On Standards (COS). It is intended to serve as the start of a catalog of exact solutions for fluid mechanics problems, and as a complement to the Verification and Validation Guide prepared by the AIAA. While the solutions presented in this paper do not necessarily test all aspects of a code or al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small increase in the entropy is noticed near the slip-wall boundary that defines the wedge surface. This increase in entropy is from numerical error and was observed to decrease in magnitude and extent as the mesh was refined, consistent with the results published by Ghia et al [150]. Table 5.6 presents the numerically computed shock angle, β , approximated as the angle between the x-axis and the point at which the oblique shock intersects the outflow boundary; and the post-shock Mach number M 2 , computed as an average of cell-centered values along a streamline.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A small increase in the entropy is noticed near the slip-wall boundary that defines the wedge surface. This increase in entropy is from numerical error and was observed to decrease in magnitude and extent as the mesh was refined, consistent with the results published by Ghia et al [150]. Table 5.6 presents the numerically computed shock angle, β , approximated as the angle between the x-axis and the point at which the oblique shock intersects the outflow boundary; and the post-shock Mach number M 2 , computed as an average of cell-centered values along a streamline.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…f n is the numerical value at cell n and f ref,n is the manufactured value evaluated at cell centroid coordinates. The Method of Manufactured Solutions and it's importance to the verification of CFD codes is widely known and is a strongly recommended method for code verification by the AIAA Committee on Standards [150].…”
Section: Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this oblique shock problem, a uniform flow impinges on an impermeable wall. Following [9], we pose the two-dimensional stationary Euler equations in the domain. When the uniform horizontal flow impinges on the wedge at the bottom of the domain, a shock will form.…”
Section: Two-dimensional Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We solve this problem setting δ = 15 • as the angle the bottom wedge makes with the horizontal. We expect the shock to make an angle of approximately 32.2 • with the horizontal, and the flow beyond the shock should have a Mach number of approximately 2.255 [9].…”
Section: Two-dimensional Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression tests are limited to cases where the discretization error in the solution can be computed directly. This includes cases where the analytical solution is known, such as test cases proposed by Ghia et al 17 , and cases with analytical solutions from the High-Order Workshops 18 . The Method of Manufactured Solutions [19][20][21] is also used to broaden the spectrum of analytical solutions.…”
Section: G Regression-testingmentioning
confidence: 99%