2015
DOI: 10.1785/0120140042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ahar‐Varzeghan Earthquake Doublet (Mw 6.4 and 6.2) of 11 August 2012: Regional Seismic Moment Tensors and a Seismotectonic Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 c; Faridi and Sartibi 2012 ). The maximum observed surface deformation is estimated to be 70 cm right-lateral motion and 25 cm vertical with an average net slip of 72 cm (Donner et al 2015 ). It is not completely clear which of the two events generated the surface rupture; however, it is favorably oriented along one of the nodal planes of the first event (as reported by global CMT), and it is difficult to associate it with the focal mechanism of the second event (see Fig.…”
Section: The Double Earthquake Of August 11 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 c; Faridi and Sartibi 2012 ). The maximum observed surface deformation is estimated to be 70 cm right-lateral motion and 25 cm vertical with an average net slip of 72 cm (Donner et al 2015 ). It is not completely clear which of the two events generated the surface rupture; however, it is favorably oriented along one of the nodal planes of the first event (as reported by global CMT), and it is difficult to associate it with the focal mechanism of the second event (see Fig.…”
Section: The Double Earthquake Of August 11 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field observations after the doublet reported an E-W trending fault trace (Copley et al 2013 ), but these authors could not with certainty state which of the two events produced the surface rupture. However, Donner et al ( 2015 ) argued that the surface rupture was produced by only the first mainshock since its fault plane is favorably oriented along the surface rupture trace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies argue both nodal planes. Donner et al (2015) argue that the earthquake waveform data together with the the rock mechanism suggest that the slip on eastwest plane is less probable and the north-south plane with eastward dipping is more presumable as the causative fault for the second mainshock. Nevertheless, one possibility is that the second mainshock is an elastic rebound which responds to the abrupt change of Coulomb stress arrangements close to the first mainshock's fault.…”
Section: Second Mainshock;mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the previous studies and calculation by national and international agencies distinct depth for the first shock is determined. Donner et al (2015) assume that the start of rupture is located at 14 km and the centroid they estimate using waveform inversion is located at shallower depth (6±1) km. Adopting their estimations, the constructed fault plane in this study have 14 km width and all main five segments start from surface and slop down 14 km (dip =90) as shown in Figures 7.…”
Section: Assessing the Source Model For The Doubletmentioning
confidence: 99%