2013
DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2013.783000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The aggregate effects of multiple comorbid risk factors on cognition among HIV-infected individuals

Abstract: This study developed and then cross-validated a novel weighting algorithm based on multiple comorbid risk factors (stimulant use, vascular disease, hepatitis C, HIV disease severity, cognitive reserve) to predict cognitive functioning among 366 HIV+ adults. The resultant “risk severity score” was used to differentially weight, as a function of age, the impact and magnitude of multiple risk factors on cognition. Among older adults (> 50 years) the risk severity index was differentially predictive of learning/me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard neuropsychological test battery can be labor intensive and requires trained personnel to administer and evaluate it. While several rapid screening instruments have been developed that can detect cognitive decline in HIV-infected persons, there is a paucity of comparative normative data in matched non-HIV populations [ 33 , 47 , 51 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 74 83 ]. Demographically adjusted normative data (i.e., adjustments to scores based on the subject's age, education, and/or race) are essential for accurately assessing HAND.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard neuropsychological test battery can be labor intensive and requires trained personnel to administer and evaluate it. While several rapid screening instruments have been developed that can detect cognitive decline in HIV-infected persons, there is a paucity of comparative normative data in matched non-HIV populations [ 33 , 47 , 51 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 74 83 ]. Demographically adjusted normative data (i.e., adjustments to scores based on the subject's age, education, and/or race) are essential for accurately assessing HAND.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients infected with HIV frequently have co-morbid conditions that may contribute to or amplify the pathogenicity of HIV, thus having an important role in the development of neurocognitive impairment (e.g. drug abuse and alcohol or infection with viral co-pathogens such as hepatitis C virus) [ 12 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invasion of the brain by the, leads to a battery of deficits including reduction in motor speed, decline in memory and concentration, CNS injury and neuropathy, which are collectively termed as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND; Woods et al, 2009 ; Patel et al, 2013 ; Sanmarti et al, 2014 ). From a clinical perspective, HAND is strongly linked to neurological disorders namely asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), mild neurocognitive disorder (MND), and HIV- associated Dementia (HAD)- the most severe form of HAND ( Woods et al, 2009 ; Patel et al, 2013 ; Sanmarti et al, 2014 ). The introduction and the widespread use of ART has managed to keep the prevalence of HAD in check.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HAND affects 20–30% patients in the late stages of AIDS and is believed to be the most common cause of dementia among people aged 40 or less worldwide ( Albright et al, 2003 ; Vivithanaporn et al, 2010 ). Cognitive, motor, and behavioral dysfunctions are the key phenotypes accompanying neuronal cell injury and death that result from HIV-1 infection of the nervous system in individuals across various age groups ( Woods et al, 2009 ; Patel et al, 2013 ; Sanmarti et al, 2014 ). In adult patients, the virus-induced disruption of the nervous system includes targeted damage to regions beneath the cortex, which significantly depletes basal ganglia levels ( Aylward et al, 1993 ; Berger and Nath, 1997 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%