2013
DOI: 10.1080/21594937.2013.823814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The agency of children from family to global human rights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the view we take in our own research is that listening is a social practice, existing in affective, cultural, embodied, relational, temporal, and spatial configurations. We argue that dominant understandings of listening to children rely heavily on cognitive, conceptual, and rational models of idealised and superficial forms of communication that ignore the everyday, embodied, and lived experiences of 'sentiment devices' (Oswell, 2013). While agreeing with positions that voices only become political speech through relationships, we also argue that the moment of encounter with children's voices needs further attention because it is precisely that moment in which a connection becomes (im) possible.…”
Section: Listening Without Hearingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As such, the view we take in our own research is that listening is a social practice, existing in affective, cultural, embodied, relational, temporal, and spatial configurations. We argue that dominant understandings of listening to children rely heavily on cognitive, conceptual, and rational models of idealised and superficial forms of communication that ignore the everyday, embodied, and lived experiences of 'sentiment devices' (Oswell, 2013). While agreeing with positions that voices only become political speech through relationships, we also argue that the moment of encounter with children's voices needs further attention because it is precisely that moment in which a connection becomes (im) possible.…”
Section: Listening Without Hearingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In particular, we see that children are not dependent on adult interventions [11] but negotiate these interventions, and that their participatory capability retroacts on their institutional environments, thereby questioning the homogenized category of "childhood" [12]. This contributes to the "ontological turn" [25,26] in the sociology of childhood as the materiality of the children's environment is reintroduced, contributing to the transition from an oppositional approach (agency versus structure) to a co-muting approach in terms of assemblages (agency within structure) [27][28][29]. Our study especially reinforces the theory of situated agency, which emphasizes the dual structuration of subjects (children) and objects (rights) occurring in situated agency (in given contexts) [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ofosu-Kusi (2017) defines children's agency as their "capacity to act independently, make decisions, and engage in actions out of their own volition" (p. 4). Children's agency can manifest through their chosen participation in activities or events, or through their capacity to act and see their actions generate an impact in their lives and/or on the world (Kumpulainen et al, 2014;Oswell, 2013;Lieten, 2008;Percy-Smith & Thomas, 2010). When children have room to exercise their agency and see its impact, they build confidence in themselves, their competencies, and their place in the world.…”
Section: Children's Agency and Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%