2022
DOI: 10.1016/bs.plm.2022.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The age-related positivity effect in cognition: A review of key findings across different cognitive domains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 154 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of results was supported by the interaction involving all the factors considered in this study: while no significant interaction emerged among age, valence, and emotion in the Reproduction task, interesting age-related differences appeared in the Bisection and Doubling tasks as a function of the negative emotion considered. In the Bisection task, older adults overestimated positive stimuli over neutral and sad faces, in line with the positivity effect [ 44 , 59 ]. In comparison, younger adults overestimated sad compared to neutral and positive stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This pattern of results was supported by the interaction involving all the factors considered in this study: while no significant interaction emerged among age, valence, and emotion in the Reproduction task, interesting age-related differences appeared in the Bisection and Doubling tasks as a function of the negative emotion considered. In the Bisection task, older adults overestimated positive stimuli over neutral and sad faces, in line with the positivity effect [ 44 , 59 ]. In comparison, younger adults overestimated sad compared to neutral and positive stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…According to this framework, from an evolutionary perspective, anger and sadness play different functions. While anger is crucial for younger people as it motivates actions and problem-solving, sadness is more salient for older adults as it favors disengagement in a time of unavoidable losses [ 44 ]. Regarding time perception, we speculated that older people’s tendency to avoid (underestimate) sadness more than anger could be due to the greater salience of this negative affect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of age-related cognitive slowing (Salthouse, 1996), it was possible that older participants would not be able to fully process the image primes due to the relatively short stimulus onset asynchrony and thereby show reduced priming effects. However, if older adults can capitalize on prior experience and knowledge (Umanath and Marsh, 2014) and on their biases to attend to emotional information (Kim and Barber, 2022), this might facilitate their processing of emotional content and allow them to compensate for the slower processing. Another possibility was that, because of impoverished emotion recognition abilities (Isaacowitz et al, 2007;Ruffman et al, 2008), older adults might show less priming-or reduced congruency effects-due to errors in emotion identification of the primes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that they might be more sensitive to priming effects because of attentional direction toward emotional information. However, older adults sometimes perform worse than younger adults at emotion recognition, especially for complex verbal materials and certain facial expressions (Isaacowitz et al, 2007;Kim and Barber, 2022). This might present a complicating factor, as it suggests that older adults may be less susceptible to priming effects, if they fail to identify the emotion in the brief SOA window.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age-related reductions in future time horizons may also explain why older adults preferentially attend to, and remember, positive over negative information—that is, display “positivity effects” (Barber et al, 2016; for reviews, see Barber & Kim, 2021; Reed & Carstensen, 2012). These positivity effects have now been documented in a wide variety of cognitive domains (for reviews, see Kim & Barber, 2022; Reed & Carstensen, 2012), including in autobiographical memory. Older adults classify more of their autobiographical memories as positive than do younger adults (Barber et al, 2020; Tomaszczyk & Fernandes, 2012) and with increasing age people are more likely to underestimate the intensity of negative emotions, they experienced in the past (e.g., Junghaenel et al, 2021; Kennedy et al, 2004; Ready et al, 2007).…”
Section: Affective Forecasting Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%