1948
DOI: 10.1056/nejm194807292390503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Age Distribution of Poliomyelitis in Massachusetts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1949
1949
1955
1955

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…California' statistics point to a lower age for reported scarlet fever in recent years. These morbidity statistics fail to conform with the generally held opinion of the pattern of poliomyelitis, but we must recall that conclusions drawn on the basis of such data are founded on a long series of assumptions of a very treacherous nature, and that certain careful investigators have pointed out hidden errors in some of the poliomyelitis data (25)(26)(27). It should be recalled also that scarlet fever may not be representative of all group A beta hemolytic streptococcal infections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…California' statistics point to a lower age for reported scarlet fever in recent years. These morbidity statistics fail to conform with the generally held opinion of the pattern of poliomyelitis, but we must recall that conclusions drawn on the basis of such data are founded on a long series of assumptions of a very treacherous nature, and that certain careful investigators have pointed out hidden errors in some of the poliomyelitis data (25)(26)(27). It should be recalled also that scarlet fever may not be representative of all group A beta hemolytic streptococcal infections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, not all evidence supports this (25)(26)(27). Increased reporting of nonparalytic cases, which are more common above 5 Measles has always shown a higher age in rural than in urban areas (16,28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 32 of 36 instances, with only a single case recognized during the first 5 days of the outbreak, no secondary spread occurred. 3. When the outbreak started with recognition of not one but a wave of two or more cases during the first 5 days of the outbreak, spread occurred on 7 of 10 occasions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all evidence supports this (25)(26)(27). Increased reporting of nonparalytic cases, which are more common above 5 years, and changes in the age composition of the population may accout for all of the changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%