Oxford Scholarship Online 2017
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198810568.003.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The African Union, the Security Council, and the International Criminal Court

Abstract: This chapter analyses the controversies surrounding the work of the African Union, the Security Council, and the International Criminal Court. It examines whether the legal justifications offered for the Security Council’s involvement in matters of international criminal justice, as administered by the ICC, match the emerging practice. The chapter reviews the drafting history of the Rome Statute to identify the initial benchmark against which to assess the Chapter VII referral and deferral resolutions and thei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Council initially ignored this petition and then decided not to discuss it but only to ‘take note’ of it in its resolution 828 (UN Security Council, 2008). Outraged at this, the AU issued the so-called Sirte-declaration in response, requesting AU member states not to cooperate with the ICC regarding the arrest warrant on Sudan’s President, Omar al-Bashir (African Union, 2009; see also Jalloh, 2017: 204–206; Mills and Bloomfield, 2017: 10–11).…”
Section: Contestation Of the International Criminal Courtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Council initially ignored this petition and then decided not to discuss it but only to ‘take note’ of it in its resolution 828 (UN Security Council, 2008). Outraged at this, the AU issued the so-called Sirte-declaration in response, requesting AU member states not to cooperate with the ICC regarding the arrest warrant on Sudan’s President, Omar al-Bashir (African Union, 2009; see also Jalloh, 2017: 204–206; Mills and Bloomfield, 2017: 10–11).…”
Section: Contestation Of the International Criminal Courtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While none of these arguments could convince either the court, the assembly of state parties or the UNSC, contestation intensified further, beginning to portray the court as a post-colonial instrument of power by the West. The court was framed as an anti-African court, not guided by legal principles but merely by a Western desire to dominate (Du Plessis, 2010; Jalloh, 2017: 188). On the heyday of this line of contestation, several African states even initiated their withdrawal from the statute, including South Africa, the Gambia and Burundi.…”
Section: Contestation Of the International Criminal Courtmentioning
confidence: 99%