Immunoglobulins 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0805-8_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Affinity of Antibody: Range, Variability, and the Role of Multivalence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Association rate constants were in the range 105-106m-1 s-1, and thus of similar magnitude to k+ values for antibody-protein antigen interactions (Karush, 1978) or for the interaction immunoglobulin E with its receptor on mast cells (Kulczycki & Metzger, 1974). All these values are about two orders of magnitude smaller than those determined for antibody-hapten reactions (Day et al, 1963;Karush, 1978). Part of this difference may be due to differences in diffusion coefficients, which are approximately proportional to (molecular weight)-l. However, it is clear that other factors must also be important in determining association rate constants of antibody-antigen interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Association rate constants were in the range 105-106m-1 s-1, and thus of similar magnitude to k+ values for antibody-protein antigen interactions (Karush, 1978) or for the interaction immunoglobulin E with its receptor on mast cells (Kulczycki & Metzger, 1974). All these values are about two orders of magnitude smaller than those determined for antibody-hapten reactions (Day et al, 1963;Karush, 1978). Part of this difference may be due to differences in diffusion coefficients, which are approximately proportional to (molecular weight)-l. However, it is clear that other factors must also be important in determining association rate constants of antibody-antigen interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Part of this difference may be due to differences in diffusion coefficients, which are approximately proportional to (molecular weight)-l. However, it is clear that other factors must also be important in determining association rate constants of antibody-antigen interactions. Even for the same hapten there can be a wide range of k+1 values (Karush, 1978), and differences in diffusion rate cannot explain the 14-fold difference between k+1 values for W3/13 and W3/25 antibodies interacting with cell surfaces. The practical consequences of low and variable k+1 values for the interpretation of absorption analyses are illustrated by the results obtained with W3/13 and W3/25 antibodies (see section 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since IgG antibodies produced for protein in an early stage of infection and for carbohydrates are known to possess a low affinity, such antibodies carry a high specificity that causes cross-reaction with a very similar or identical antigenic structure (7,16). Gilmore et al (10,11) demonstrated the cross-reactivity of rOmp B between SFG and TG and confirmed the ompB gene homology by Southern blot analysis using the cloned DNA of R. rickettsii ompB.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunological term avidity was coined more than fifty years ago to distinguish between the binding properties of an antibody and its monovalent Fab fragment (reviewed in (Karush, 1989)). It was observed that an IgG, at low concentrations, could bind to a surface containing multiple binding sites (epitopes) with an apparent affinity that was orders of magnitude greater than the equilibrium constant for binding of one of its Fab sites to an epitope (Gopalakrishnan & Karush, 1974;Greenbury et al, 1965;Hornick & Karusch, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%