2011
DOI: 10.5964/ijpr.v5isupp1.81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Affective Component of Secure Base schema in a Japanese and a Chinese sample: Evidence from Affective Priming Paradigm

Abstract: The affective priming paradigm (Murphy & Zajonc, 1993) was adapted to assess the affective component of the secure base schema in a Japanese (Study 1) and a Chinese sample (Study 2). The priming effects of secure base pictures and positive pictures on evaluation of neutral stimuli were examined. The attachment dimensions, both anxiety and avoidance, were also measured for all participants. The subliminal priming of secure base pictures was found to lead to greater positive liking ratings to neutral stimuli tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He is wearing white pants and holding a baseball bat in his right hand, and a girl who is wearing a white top and short blue pants is curled up on the floor in a corner.” for the insecure attachment condition, and “Twelve overlapping gray heptagons are presented against a gray background.” for the neutral condition. For all the conditions, we chose stimuli that are commonly used in research on attachment (Dalgleish et al, 2007; Li and Kato, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He is wearing white pants and holding a baseball bat in his right hand, and a girl who is wearing a white top and short blue pants is curled up on the floor in a corner.” for the insecure attachment condition, and “Twelve overlapping gray heptagons are presented against a gray background.” for the neutral condition. For all the conditions, we chose stimuli that are commonly used in research on attachment (Dalgleish et al, 2007; Li and Kato, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%