2011
DOI: 10.1075/ssol.1.2.03chr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The aesthetic paradox in processing conventional and non-conventional metaphors

Abstract: This study focuses on the relationship between cognitive effort and aestheticemotional evaluation in the processing of conventional and non-conventional metaphors. We postulate that an increased cognitive load -which is normally perceived as stressful -is evaluated positively when processing non-conventional metaphors. We have called this contradictory suspense 'aesthetic paradox' . The aesthetic paradox was tested in two studies that differed in degree of processing demand. In study 1 (low processing demand) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also opens the field for the application of the model to other psycholinguistic research questions. In this field, often decision tasks with trial durations beyond 1.5 s are used (e.g., Christmann, Wimmer, & Groeben, 2011; Johnson, 1996; Spotorno & Noveck, 2014). The diffusion model can provide a more fine-grained analysis of the processes involved in the execution of these tasks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also opens the field for the application of the model to other psycholinguistic research questions. In this field, often decision tasks with trial durations beyond 1.5 s are used (e.g., Christmann, Wimmer, & Groeben, 2011; Johnson, 1996; Spotorno & Noveck, 2014). The diffusion model can provide a more fine-grained analysis of the processes involved in the execution of these tasks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We name this intent as persuasive. In addition, inspired by a variety of arousing, humorous, or aesthetic effects of metaphors (Christmann et al, 2011), the expressive is included in our intent annotation within the enlarged definition: expressing attitude, thought, emotion, feeling, attachment, etc. Based on these factors as well as investigation of the samples in our datasets, we generalized their taxonomy and listed the categories of the author intent in metaphor as descriptive,persuasive, expressive, and others.…”
Section: Intent and Sentiment Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%