1992
DOI: 10.2307/430951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Aesthetic Essence of Art

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, in all this talk of art, we have made mention only in passing of one of the key components of stand‐up comedy: that it is created with the intention of evoking laughter. While the functionalist idea of it “providing a [generally] pleasurable experience” (Davies 2001b, 171) does not exhaust definitions of art, the notion that a thing of art is intended to be apprehended not only intellectually but through some form of affective appreciation still lingers (Lind 1992). While space prohibits taking up this idea here, affectivity nevertheless lies at the core of both vernacular theory and scholarship on stand‐up comedy: that it exists not only in part but primarily to produce an affective response, and its success or failure is marked almost purely by how well it does so 11…”
Section: Defining “Defining Stand‐up” and Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, in all this talk of art, we have made mention only in passing of one of the key components of stand‐up comedy: that it is created with the intention of evoking laughter. While the functionalist idea of it “providing a [generally] pleasurable experience” (Davies 2001b, 171) does not exhaust definitions of art, the notion that a thing of art is intended to be apprehended not only intellectually but through some form of affective appreciation still lingers (Lind 1992). While space prohibits taking up this idea here, affectivity nevertheless lies at the core of both vernacular theory and scholarship on stand‐up comedy: that it exists not only in part but primarily to produce an affective response, and its success or failure is marked almost purely by how well it does so 11…”
Section: Defining “Defining Stand‐up” and Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The claim that experience has no phenomenal character in itself is, according to him, more or less based on verbal legerdemain. 38 For just what is meant by "the phenomenal character of experience"? I would say that my having an experience with a certain phenomenal character is none other than my having a given phenomenal feature.…”
Section: Transparency and Aesthetic Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, the two were utilized interchangeably; however, an attempt to distinguish between them was found in each field. Within aesthetics, Lind (1992) maintains that artwork is the product or result of art, which is a creative process. "Art is the creative arrangement of one or more media with the immediate principal purpose of communicating a sigruficant aesthetic object.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…interpretation of the artwork is a crucial element. Lind (1992) suggests that the moment something is considered an artwork it becomes subject to interpretation.…”
Section: The Art Of Nursing: a Concept Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%