The Adversarial Machine Learning Conundrum: Can the Insecurity of ML Become the Achilles' Heel of Cognitive Networks?

Abstract

The holy grail of networking is to create cognitive networks that organize, manage, and drive themselves. Such a vision now seems attainable thanks in large part to the progress in the field of machine learning (ML), which has now already disrupted a number of industries and revolutionized practically all fields of research. But are the ML models foolproof and robust to security attacks to be in charge of managing the network? Unfortunately, many modern ML models are easily misled by simple and easily-crafted adversarial perturbations, which does not bode well for the future of ML-based cognitive networks unless ML vulnerabilities for the cognitive networking environment are identified, addressed, and fixed. The purpose of this article is to highlight the problem of insecure ML and to sensitize the readers to the danger of adversarial ML by showing how an easilycrafted adversarial ML example can compromise the operations of the cognitive self-driving network. In this paper, we demonstrate adversarial attacks on two simple yet representative cognitive networking applications (namely, intrusion detection and network traffic classification). We also provide some guidelines to design secure ML models for cognitive networks that are robust to adversarial attacks on the ML pipeline of cognitive networks.

Secure and Robust Machine Learning for Healthcare: A Survey

“…2) Adversarial Machine Learning (ML): Adversarial attacks are the result of recent efforts for identifying vulnerabilities in ML/DL models training and inference. Adversarial attacks have appeared as one of the biggest security threats to ML/DL systems [20], [98], [99], [100], [101]. In adversarial attacks, the key goal of an adversary is to generate adversarial examples by adding small carefully crafted (unnoticeable) perturbation into the actual (non-modified) input samples to evade the integrity of the ML/DL system.…”

Examining Machine Learning for 5G and Beyond Through an Adversarial Lens

“…2) Evaluating a defense: In the following, we have provided a few important evaluation guidelines for evaluating the ML-based 5G applications against adversarial ML attacks. These insights are extracted from the Carlini et al [19] and our previous works [6], [20].…”

Securing Machine Learning in the Cloud: A Systematic Review of Cloud Machine Learning Security

“…Both of the aforementioned outsourcing strategies come with new security concerns. In addition, the literature suggests that different types of attacks can be realized on different components of the communication network as well ( Usama et al, 2020a ), for example, intrusion detection ( Han et al, 2020 ; Usama et al, 2020b ), network traffic classification ( Usama et al, 2019 ), and malware detection systems ( Chen et al, 2018 ). Moreover, adversarial ML attacks have also been devised for client-side ML classifiers, that is, Google’s phishing pages filter ( Liang et al, 2016 ).…”