2013
DOI: 10.1308/204268513x13626856629348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The advantages and disadvantages of providing minor oral surgery in primary care

Abstract: The National Health Service (NHS) has recently been faced with increasing government targets at the same time as increasing spending cuts. Within the current fiscal constraints, the NHS is expected to deliver quality services while at the same time ensuring value for money.1 Since 1995 there have been developments to move the delivery of specialist dental care into the primary healthcare sector. This followed a report by the Chief Dental Officer (CDO) for England, who reviewed the arrangements for specialist t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulties in accessing hospital endodontic services were highlighted by the findings of this study, together with the potential to reduce referrals and address the gap in service provision by a number of routes within a contemporary care pathway lending support for an established service, ideally in a phased manner with close monitoring and evaluation to ensure that patients are seen in the most appropriate setting. The cost-effectiveness of such schemes, has been suggested in previous studies which evaluated specialist services for Minor Oral Surgery provided in primary care, and reported the potential to reduce the secondary care costs [ 40 42 ]; however, moving any endodontic services to primary care DwSIs is unlikely to result in major savings as hospital services are provided on an outpatient tariff, usually within block contracts and dental monies are difficult to extract from ‘block’ contractual arrangements. Second, because there is limited hospital capacity [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties in accessing hospital endodontic services were highlighted by the findings of this study, together with the potential to reduce referrals and address the gap in service provision by a number of routes within a contemporary care pathway lending support for an established service, ideally in a phased manner with close monitoring and evaluation to ensure that patients are seen in the most appropriate setting. The cost-effectiveness of such schemes, has been suggested in previous studies which evaluated specialist services for Minor Oral Surgery provided in primary care, and reported the potential to reduce the secondary care costs [ 40 42 ]; however, moving any endodontic services to primary care DwSIs is unlikely to result in major savings as hospital services are provided on an outpatient tariff, usually within block contracts and dental monies are difficult to extract from ‘block’ contractual arrangements. Second, because there is limited hospital capacity [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has an impact on the confidence of GDPs regarding oral surgery. The 2006 contract for NHS GDS dentistry has also led to an increase in referrals for MOS procedures to Secondary care causing further deskilling among referrers . We have sought to create a training programme to upskill GDPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%