The Advance Mentoring-for-Leadership Lunch Series for Women Faculty in Stem at the University of Washington

Abstract

Given the increasingly smaller number of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields as one progresses through the academic pipeline, it is often very difficult for women in STEM faculty positions to find a community of women and identify women mentors, especially at the upper rungs of the academic ladder. Group mentoring opportunities are one strategy to connect women STEM faculty and generate greater interest and success in academic leadership. In 2003 the University of Washington (UW) ADVANCE program introduced the Mentoring-for-Leadership lunch series to encourage women faculty to consider leadership; expose women faculty to various career paths; and build a community of women faculty in STEM. This paper describes the UW program, the literature that informs the program, and the participants' experiences. This paper also offers recommendations for replicating this program at other campuses.

The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017

“…Women faculty may seek advice on publishing, grants, colleagues, work-family balance, or career advice in general (Feeney and Bernal 2010). Mentoring with the goal for advancing to leadership positions (O'Bannon et al 2010;Yen et al 2007) is also key for recruiting and retaining women in STEM in all levels of academia.…”

ICT Definition Implication on ICT Career Choice and Exclusion among Women

“…Another observable fact noted worldwide is the disciplines or professions taken up by women at university level. Women are found mainly in education, humanities and social sciences rather than science, mathematics and technology [7] . There are a far smaller number of women in the computing and IT fields than men today.…”

Tailor-made: Meeting the unique needs of women of color STEM-SBS faculty through mentoring

“…The main mentoring models are: the traditional one-on-one, group-(or network) and peer-mentoring. At the University of Washington [25], for example, a network-based (or group) mentoring model is found to be appropriate for that institution. They did not find the oneon-one, single-mentor model to be an effective means for mentoring their junior faculty.…”