2020
DOI: 10.1177/0894486520904461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adulthood of Family Business Research Through Inbound and Outbound Theorizing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, our regression analyses reveal insignificant intercepts for both positive and negative CSR news (Table 2), which is in line with the previous findings of Capelle-Blancard and Petit (2019) and Fernandez-Izquierdo et al (2009). Moreover, our research findings contribute to the disentanglement of the stock market implications of CSR by showing that investors' reactions to such news substantially depend on factors that affect signal credibility (such as family firm status) or determine the signaling environment (i.e., the economic situation) and thus the signal fit (Jaskiewicz et al, 2020). As such, we inform and advance the current CSR debate by shifting it toward a discussion of contingency factors rather than a question of general directionality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Generally, our regression analyses reveal insignificant intercepts for both positive and negative CSR news (Table 2), which is in line with the previous findings of Capelle-Blancard and Petit (2019) and Fernandez-Izquierdo et al (2009). Moreover, our research findings contribute to the disentanglement of the stock market implications of CSR by showing that investors' reactions to such news substantially depend on factors that affect signal credibility (such as family firm status) or determine the signaling environment (i.e., the economic situation) and thus the signal fit (Jaskiewicz et al, 2020). As such, we inform and advance the current CSR debate by shifting it toward a discussion of contingency factors rather than a question of general directionality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is not merely a description of a phenomenon, but a discipline “interested in the unobservable mental processes underlying the behavior rather than the behavior itself” (Colman, 1999, p. 3). Therefore, psychology has the potential to align with the boundary-spanning nature of family business research (Holt et al, 2018; Jaskiewicz et al, 2020). Specifically, psychology research may allow family business scholars to extend and enrich current predictions about family firm behaviors (Gagné et al, 2014), and hence their heterogeneity vis-à-vis other firms and among family businesses.…”
Section: The Psychological Foundations Of Management In Family Firmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This third instalment is edited by Alfredo De Massis, Danny Holt, Peter Jaskiewicz, and Don Neubaum and covers some very important topics, including the work–family interface, conflict management, family science theories, and consumer perspectives of family business. Collectively, these four reviews demonstrate the maturity of the family business field and highlight the many opportunities family business scholars have for a “bidirectional exchange across fields” (Jaskiewicz et al, 2020, p. 14).…”
Section: Foresightmentioning
confidence: 99%