2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adsorption of perchlorate, sulfate, selenate and water on Au(111)-textured electrodes from aqueous solutions: Simultaneous voltammetric, optical and microgravimetric studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, however, cannot fully explain the drastic difference in EOG activity between neutral and alkaline conditions that is experimentally observed above OH adsorption potentials. As we have shown that adsorbed hydroxides lower the barriers for EOG, to explain this kinetic difference, we suspect the low reaction rates or currents are due to the SO 4 2– and ClO 4 – anions used in neutral EOG experiments. , Both anions are known to specifically adsorb on gold surfaces between 0.2 and 1.05 V RHE and to reach 0.15–0.2 ML surface coverages. , The low currents can be explained by combining the fact that SO 4 2– is adsorbed on the surface at potentials up to 1.2 V RHE at pH = 0, after which Au surface oxidation begins, with the anions’ suspected role in blocking GLY or GLD adsorption . Surface-enhanced IR absorption spectroscopy measurements have also shown that Au­(OH) ads and adsorbed SO 4 2– can coexist up to 1.5 V RHE under neutral conditions which coincides well with our calculated OH adsorption potential at pH = 7 and the experimental onset potential around 1.2–1.3 V RHE .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results, however, cannot fully explain the drastic difference in EOG activity between neutral and alkaline conditions that is experimentally observed above OH adsorption potentials. As we have shown that adsorbed hydroxides lower the barriers for EOG, to explain this kinetic difference, we suspect the low reaction rates or currents are due to the SO 4 2– and ClO 4 – anions used in neutral EOG experiments. , Both anions are known to specifically adsorb on gold surfaces between 0.2 and 1.05 V RHE and to reach 0.15–0.2 ML surface coverages. , The low currents can be explained by combining the fact that SO 4 2– is adsorbed on the surface at potentials up to 1.2 V RHE at pH = 0, after which Au surface oxidation begins, with the anions’ suspected role in blocking GLY or GLD adsorption . Surface-enhanced IR absorption spectroscopy measurements have also shown that Au­(OH) ads and adsorbed SO 4 2– can coexist up to 1.5 V RHE under neutral conditions which coincides well with our calculated OH adsorption potential at pH = 7 and the experimental onset potential around 1.2–1.3 V RHE .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If the error due to the functional is accounted for, then OH adsorption under acidic condition becomes possible at 1.20 V RHE . In addition, experimental measurements are often performed in solutions containing SO 4 2– or ClO 4 – species which also adsorb on gold surfaces and directly influence the OH adsorption/desorption potential under acidic and, to a lesser extent, neutral conditions by blocking possible OH adsorption sites. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…16,19 The differences are likely related to the specific adsorption of (H)SO 4 2− which adsorbs on the surface even in dilute (H)SO 4 2− solutions. 40,41 Perchlorate also adsorbs on the Au(111) surface although not as strongly as (hydrogen)sulfate 42 which may explain the differences between the EOG activity in solutions containing ClO 4…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%