1990
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(90)90118-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adsorption of metal oxyanions on alumina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it has been reported that tungstate has a broad adsorption envelope across a wide pH range with maximum adsorption below pH 5.1, more than 50% of WO 4 2− adsorption at neutral pH, and only 10% above pH 10 on the goethite surface (Xu et al, 2006). Mulcahy et al (1990) concluded that tungstate adsorbs on two types of surface sites producing loosely and tightly bound surface species. According to Mulcahy et al's (1990) study of adsorption of tungstate on alumina surfaces on the basis of EXAFS measurements and ratios of adsorbed tungstate, both loosely and tightly bound species were formed by the adsorption of polymeric tungstate anions when the pH of the impregnating solution is low enough to form these polymeric anions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, it has been reported that tungstate has a broad adsorption envelope across a wide pH range with maximum adsorption below pH 5.1, more than 50% of WO 4 2− adsorption at neutral pH, and only 10% above pH 10 on the goethite surface (Xu et al, 2006). Mulcahy et al (1990) concluded that tungstate adsorbs on two types of surface sites producing loosely and tightly bound surface species. According to Mulcahy et al's (1990) study of adsorption of tungstate on alumina surfaces on the basis of EXAFS measurements and ratios of adsorbed tungstate, both loosely and tightly bound species were formed by the adsorption of polymeric tungstate anions when the pH of the impregnating solution is low enough to form these polymeric anions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For modeling, inner-sphere molybdate and tungstate surface complexes on goethite and ferrihydrite were used. ,, This was verified by numerous experimental work (on lepidocrocite and goethite using in situ ATR-IR, , on goethite by pressure-jump relaxation and EXAFS). The adsorption of POM (usually heptamer) is rarely assumed; however, it has been evoked for molybdenum on catalyst supports, both as outer-sphere or inner-sphere surface complexes. The last possibility was the formation of a surface polymer, which had been found to be consistent with EXAFS measurement of Mo on goethite and W on boehmite …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 In an effort to optimize the immobilization conditions, we immobilized the POM clusters under various pH conditions ranging from 6 to 1 (Figure 1) The W=O and W-O stretching and bending vibrations of the P2W15 generally occur below 1000 cm -1 thus it is difficult to detect them by Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) due to the strong IR absorption of the γ-Al2O3 supports in this region ( Figure S2). 13,27 The XRD pattern of the , respectively, which can be assigned to the W=O stretch bands and W-O-W stretch modes of the immobilized cluster.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%