2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.126723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adsorption mechanisms of Hg0 on marcasite-type metal selenides: The influences of metal-terminated site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In compariosn to O introduction, the effects of Se introduction on the Hg 0 removal performance of metal sulfides were more extensively studied. The affinity constant of mercury to Se is 10, approximately one million times higher than its affinity to S, which is attributed to the closer energy level between Hg and Se. ,, Thus, the introduced Se sites can directly combine with Hg 0 to form mercury selenide (HgSe). ,, The low electronegativity of lattice Se sites can weaken the Hg 0 adsorption at M sites, which facilitated Hg 0 diffusion to combine with unsaturated S or Se sites . For these reasons, the Hg 0 adsorption capacity of 8Se–FeS (∼2450 μg g –1 ) was two magnitudes higher than that of bare Fe 1– x S (∼21 μg g –1 ) (Figure ).…”
Section: Engineered Metal Sulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In compariosn to O introduction, the effects of Se introduction on the Hg 0 removal performance of metal sulfides were more extensively studied. The affinity constant of mercury to Se is 10, approximately one million times higher than its affinity to S, which is attributed to the closer energy level between Hg and Se. ,, Thus, the introduced Se sites can directly combine with Hg 0 to form mercury selenide (HgSe). ,, The low electronegativity of lattice Se sites can weaken the Hg 0 adsorption at M sites, which facilitated Hg 0 diffusion to combine with unsaturated S or Se sites . For these reasons, the Hg 0 adsorption capacity of 8Se–FeS (∼2450 μg g –1 ) was two magnitudes higher than that of bare Fe 1– x S (∼21 μg g –1 ) (Figure ).…”
Section: Engineered Metal Sulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 For the octahedral-coordinated M atom, its original d electrons are arranged in non-bonding orbital t 2g and antibonding orbital e g *, and the coordination strength is inversely proportional to the number of electrons in the e g * orbital (Figure 2). 45 Thus, the adsorption energy of Hg 0 at the M site of marcasite-type MSe 2 (M = Fe, Co, and Cu) followed the order of Fe > Co > Cu. For the same M sites, the coordination number is regarded as a simple descriptor to estimate the attraction of M sites toward Hg 0 , and the appropriate reduction of the coordination number can facilitate Hg 0 capture.…”
Section: Raw Metal Sulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a certain amount of FeSe 2 and Se–Fe bond generation during the preparation process of the composite. The previous literatures reported that the adsorption of gaseous mercury by FeSe 2 was comprehensively studied by both DFT calculation and experiments. , So, this part mainly investigated the selenium–iron bond on mercury removal by DFT. Figure a–c) and Figure S9 show the models, energy band structures, and DOS diagrams of SrFeO 3‑δ , SrFeO 3‑δ /HNTs, and Se-SrFeO 3‑δ /HNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mercury is a toxic air pollutant with high volatility, and is harmful to human health and ecosystem [1][2][3][4][5]. Thermal power plant is considered to be a main source of gaseous anthropogenic mercury emissions in China [6][7][8]. The Minamata Convention on Mercury has officially come into force in August 2017 to restrict the global anthropogenic mercury emissions [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%