1996
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(95)01069-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adsorption and decomposition of formic acid on Cu {110}

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
93
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
13
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 with a precursor state parameter of 0.13 Fig. 6 Formic acid sticking probability dependence of uptake on Cu(110), for 0.25 monolayers of preadsorbed atomic oxygen, at a variety of crystal temperatures [20,23]. Note the independence of S upon uptake at 300 K up to *90 % of the maximum uptake shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mobile Precursors Results In Increased Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2 with a precursor state parameter of 0.13 Fig. 6 Formic acid sticking probability dependence of uptake on Cu(110), for 0.25 monolayers of preadsorbed atomic oxygen, at a variety of crystal temperatures [20,23]. Note the independence of S upon uptake at 300 K up to *90 % of the maximum uptake shown in Fig.…”
Section: Mobile Precursors Results In Increased Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all let us consider the reaction between pre-adsorbed oxygen atoms (the base) and gas phase formic acid. The sticking probability of formic acid is low, at *0.1 [20,21], but upon pre-adsorption of oxygen atoms the reaction probability is very high at 0.82 (see Fig. 6) [20,22].…”
Section: Mobile Precursors Results In Increased Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At elevated temperatures ͑300-450°C͒, formate molecules are chemically adsorbed on the Cu surface by dehydrogenation ͑on a clean surface͒ or the release of water ͑on an oxygenprecovered surface͒ of the formic acid. [7][8][9][10] To determine the formate adsorption structures, several experimental methods have been used: 7,[11][12][13][14][15] near-edge x-ray-absorption fine structure ͑NEXAFS͒ spectroscopy, surface-extended x-rayabsorption fine structure ͑SEXAFS͒ spectroscopy, lowenergy electron diffraction ͑LEED͒, Auger electron spectroscopy, temperature-programed desorption, scanning tunneling microscopy ͑STM͒, reflection-absorption infrared spectroscopy, and in situ infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy.…”
Section: Previous Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%