2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adriatic Sea and Coast modelling suite: Evaluation of the meteotsunami forecast component

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 June 2014: for Vela Luka, Rijeka dubrovačka, Vrboska, and Stari Grad, which all have been reported to be flooded (Šepić et al, 2016). This is in accordance with the forecasted deterministic ADCIRC maximum In summary, for the five studied historical events, the surrogate model of meteotsunami maximum elevation is capable of forecasting the meteotsunami hazard in the areas that were flooded, which was not always the case of the deterministic ADCIRC model (Denamiel et al, 2019). Unfortunately, for many events, it also predicts flooding in areas where no meteotsunami impact was reported.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Oceanssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 June 2014: for Vela Luka, Rijeka dubrovačka, Vrboska, and Stari Grad, which all have been reported to be flooded (Šepić et al, 2016). This is in accordance with the forecasted deterministic ADCIRC maximum In summary, for the five studied historical events, the surrogate model of meteotsunami maximum elevation is capable of forecasting the meteotsunami hazard in the areas that were flooded, which was not always the case of the deterministic ADCIRC model (Denamiel et al, 2019). Unfortunately, for many events, it also predicts flooding in areas where no meteotsunami impact was reported.…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Oceanssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The first evaluation of the CMeEWS is performed against well-recorded events that took place, before the early warning system became operational, at five locations of interest: Vela Luka, Rijeka dubrovačka, Stari Grad, Vrboska, and Ston (Figure 1). In 2014, two strong events happened at the end of June (Šepić et al, 2016), (Denamiel et al, 2019). For five of these events, the deterministic results of the AdriSC meteotsunami forecast component have already been evaluated against a set of 48 air pressure sensors and 19 tide gauges (Denamiel et al, 2019).…”
Section: Evaluation Against Historical Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we perform sensitivity experiments selecting a subset of cu, mp, ra and pbl parameterizations that are suited for high-resolution simulations and that have been used in previous meteotsunamis studies using high-resolution non-hydrostatic atmospheric models (Belušić et al 2007;Šepić et al 2009;Tanaka 2010;Orlić et al 2010;Renault et al 2011;Horvath and Vilibić 2014;Horvath et al 2018;Denamiel et al 2019). The radt parameter is also considered here.…”
Section: Wrf Sensitivity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other systems were developed more recently. Denamiel et al (2019) presented the Adriatic Sea and Coast modeling suite, including a coupled WRF-ROMS configuration, which then forces the barotropic unstructured model ADCIRC. The model was shown to be able to capture atmospheric disturbances, but with a misrepresentation of the timing and details of the perturbations in turn affecting the magnitude of the modeled meteotsunamis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation