2013
DOI: 10.1080/02673843.2013.804423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adolescent mind in school: theory of mind and self-concept in Canadian and Polish youth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(55 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This total score demonstrated acceptable internal reliability (α = .62), and the two stories were positively correlated (r = .63, p < .001). These psychometrics are similar to those obtained in past studies in which the SAS was employed with children and young adolescents (e.g., Bosacki, 2000;Bosacki & Astington, 1999;Bosacki et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theory Of Mindsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This total score demonstrated acceptable internal reliability (α = .62), and the two stories were positively correlated (r = .63, p < .001). These psychometrics are similar to those obtained in past studies in which the SAS was employed with children and young adolescents (e.g., Bosacki, 2000;Bosacki & Astington, 1999;Bosacki et al, 2013).…”
Section: Theory Of Mindsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Modified Social Ambiguous Stories (MSAS, Bosacki et al, 2015). This questionnaire features the same stories and questions as the original Social Ambiguous Stories interview task (SAS, Bosacki & Astington, 1999) but was modified for administration as a questionnaire by the third and original author by specifying multiple fixed-answer responses that were typical of those responses that children produced in the interview format.…”
Section: Theory Of Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess advanced ToM at both time points, we used the Modified Social Ambiguous Story Task (Bosacki et al, 2013), conducted as individual interviews with two brief vignettes consisting of an ambiguous social situation. In each story, two protagonists take some action toward the third person, and this action may be justified in different ways.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies on gender differences in ToM mostly refer to children or preadolescents and are still inconclusive, with some studies finding that girls score higher than boys (Bosacki, Białecka-Pikul, & Szpak, 2013; Devine & Hughes, 2013; Walker, 2005). However, some of the research confirms that gender differences are found in adolescents’ social cognitive and language abilities, favoring the girls’ understanding of interpretive mental processes over boys during mid-adolescence (Białecka-Pikul et al, 2017; Weimer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Statement Of Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, adolescents with low ToM abilities may interpret neutral emotions as hostile attitudes towards them (Liu et al, 2018; Shakoor et al, 2012), so bullying behavior may serve as an aggressive way to protect themselves against anticipated threats (Badenes et al, 2000; Fink et al, 2015). Third, individuals with low ToM capacity may misunderstand jokes and ironic conversations (Bosacki et al, 2015). This may trigger retaliatory aggression and then lead to bullying behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%