1982
DOI: 10.1179/bjms.1982.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Administrative Prevalence of Mental Handicap in the City of Cardiff: An Examination of Geographical Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By using a wide range of sources from both health and social services, we believe that we identified the large majority of the learning disability population. Our estimate of the prevalence of learning disability is higher than that previously reported for the City of Cardiff (Humphreys et al , 1981). This is due in part to the use of a wider range of health service data than in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…By using a wide range of sources from both health and social services, we believe that we identified the large majority of the learning disability population. Our estimate of the prevalence of learning disability is higher than that previously reported for the City of Cardiff (Humphreys et al , 1981). This is due in part to the use of a wider range of health service data than in the previous study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Exact figures on such practice-based variation do not exist but data from a study by Mansell & Felce (1985) of the variation of the prevalence of people with learning disabilities in residential care across the, then, local government districts do illustrate that populations of the order of 60,000-80,000 can differ significantly. Variation is associated with a variety of factors such as the level of social deprivation within the practice area (Humphreys et al, 1984;Currie, 1995), differential resettlement from hospitals to specific areas, patient or carers, choice of doctor, or birth cohort effects. Application of data from service registers leads to apparent underestimates (Horne, 1989).…”
Section: Review Of Current Practice Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%