1974
DOI: 10.1177/001872087401600306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Administrative Experiment: A Special Case of Field Testing or Evaluation

Abstract: This paper describes a particular strategy and method of field testing or evaluation: administrative experimentation. The method is first defined in terms of its relation t o other methods, and its potential strengths and limitations. Second, the method itself is described in some detail. Finally, case studies of its use are presented to provide a basis for evaluating the usefulness of the method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buxton and Sniderman (1980) refer to the process of test/modify/test as design interation. It is similar to the "user trial" proposed for product evaluation in ergonomics (Johnson & Baker, 1974;Rennie, 1981;Thompson & Rath, 1974).…”
Section: Product Development Evaluanonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Buxton and Sniderman (1980) refer to the process of test/modify/test as design interation. It is similar to the "user trial" proposed for product evaluation in ergonomics (Johnson & Baker, 1974;Rennie, 1981;Thompson & Rath, 1974).…”
Section: Product Development Evaluanonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These two purposes are seen as complementary. Research with the framework can provide a basis to support and evaluate management actions; management use of the framework can provide a test arena for research (Thompson and Rath, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%