1964
DOI: 10.1177/001698626400800111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adjustment of Gifted Children in Special Classes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These children are, of course, indeed different, at least intellectually, and they are perceived that way by themselves (Janos, Fung, & Robinson, in press), their parents (Freeman, 1979), and their peers. There is strong evidence from the ratings of parents and teachers, however, that, in general, the peer relations of intellectually gifted children are satisfactory, although not necessarily superior to those of children not identified as gifted (Barbe, 1964;Bracken, 1970;Lehman & Erdwins, 1981). In the Janos (1983) study, for example, both parents and teachers rated a sample of 79 intellectually gifted children as being well within the normative range on the social skills scale of the Personality Inventory for Children (Wirt, Lachar, Klinedinst, & Seat, 1977).…”
Section: Peer Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These children are, of course, indeed different, at least intellectually, and they are perceived that way by themselves (Janos, Fung, & Robinson, in press), their parents (Freeman, 1979), and their peers. There is strong evidence from the ratings of parents and teachers, however, that, in general, the peer relations of intellectually gifted children are satisfactory, although not necessarily superior to those of children not identified as gifted (Barbe, 1964;Bracken, 1970;Lehman & Erdwins, 1981). In the Janos (1983) study, for example, both parents and teachers rated a sample of 79 intellectually gifted children as being well within the normative range on the social skills scale of the Personality Inventory for Children (Wirt, Lachar, Klinedinst, & Seat, 1977).…”
Section: Peer Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%