2006
DOI: 10.1088/0143-0807/28/1/011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adiabatic invariance of the action variable in classical dynamics

Abstract: We consider one-dimensional classical time-dependent Hamiltonian systems with quasi-periodic orbits. It is well-known that such systems possess an adiabatic invariant which coincides with the action variable of the Hamiltonian formalism. We present a new proof of the adiabatic invariance of this quantity and illustrate our arguments by means of explicit calculations for the harmonic oscillator.The new proof makes essential use of the Hamiltonian formalism. The key step is the introduction of a slowly-varying q… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising since under adiabatic variations of the potential it is the time average of the actions that remains constant (see Goldstein et al 2001; Wells & Siklos 2006). In general, for a given orbit the amplitude of the oscillation depends on the time‐scale on which the potential grows.…”
Section: Frequency Space For Time‐dependent Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is not surprising since under adiabatic variations of the potential it is the time average of the actions that remains constant (see Goldstein et al 2001; Wells & Siklos 2006). In general, for a given orbit the amplitude of the oscillation depends on the time‐scale on which the potential grows.…”
Section: Frequency Space For Time‐dependent Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For epicyclic particles additional adiabatic invariants are identified with the action variables J i of classical dynamics, with i = R, z (see for example Refs. [36][37][38]. These are defined in terms of line integrals over complete periods of the orbit in the (p i , q i ) plane as…”
Section: Adiabatic Invariantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are in fact, exact invariants, such as the Ermakov-Lewis invariant, which remain unchanged even under more general time-dependent situations [24]. A proper proof of the adiabatic invariance of the classical action was constructed in [23] for a general Harmonic oscillator. Our aim is to check the whether the action variable J proposed here is such an invariant for the corresponding nonlinear oscillator.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as mentioned in the introduction, an important reason for the Action-Angle method is its application to situations where the Hamiltonian of the dynamical system is time-dependent. In this situation, the action-angle method gives rise to adiabatic invariants [23], which do not change and are important in checking the integrability of the model in question. As in the harmonic oscillator case, one can express the frequency of a general system as,…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%