2019
DOI: 10.1002/mame.201900638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adhesion‐Enhanced Contact Electrification and Efficiency of Triboelectric Nanogenerators

Abstract: In the present work, the contact electrification of polymers that differ in adhesion strength is studied. Electrical current is measured along with adhesion in macroscale contacting‐separation experiments. Additionally, local adhesion and roughness are studied with atomic force microscopy to get deeper insight into relations between surface properties and electrification. Measurements reveal that higher surface charge is formed on more adhesive surfaces, thus confirming covalent bond cleavage as a mechanism fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of a TENG device is very different depending on whether a positive or negative voltage is applied for poling (Figure 2), regardless of the polymer used. This phenomenon of one polarization direction resulting in a larger impact than the other is widely reported before (Bai et al, 2014;Suo et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2016;Sutka et al, 2018;Lap cinskis et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2020); however, the explanation provided for that has been inaccurate. We argue that the observed difference can be explained by elementary match and mismatch between the directions of the electric field from the ferroelectric dipole moment and the dipole moment created by triboelectric charges.…”
Section: Ll Open Access Isciencementioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The performance of a TENG device is very different depending on whether a positive or negative voltage is applied for poling (Figure 2), regardless of the polymer used. This phenomenon of one polarization direction resulting in a larger impact than the other is widely reported before (Bai et al, 2014;Suo et al, 2016;Lee et al, 2016;Sutka et al, 2018;Lap cinskis et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2020); however, the explanation provided for that has been inaccurate. We argue that the observed difference can be explained by elementary match and mismatch between the directions of the electric field from the ferroelectric dipole moment and the dipole moment created by triboelectric charges.…”
Section: Ll Open Access Isciencementioning
confidence: 59%
“…The most obvious way is to increase the specific contact area via nanostructuring (Zhang et al, 2015;Dudem et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2014). Another possibility is the modification of surface or physicochemical properties of the triboelectric material Lap cinskis et al, 2019;Fan et al, 2014;Yun et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2016). The performance can be also enhanced by using ferroelectric polymer or composite films as the contacting surfaces (Bai et al, 2014;Seung et al, 2017;Suo et al, 2016;Chun et al, 2015;Yang and Daoud, 2017;Choi et al, 2017;Lee et al, 2016;Sutka et al, 2018;Lap cinskis et al, 2019;Kim et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations