1999
DOI: 10.3109/02841859909175572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Additional Value of us to Mammography in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Abstract: The overall additional value of US to mammography in the diagnosis of breast cancer was rather limited in a population of mixed malignant tumors. Excluding cancers with mammographically conclusive diagnosis and suspicious microcalcifications as well as DCIS from analysis, US correctly upgraded more than 40% of palpable and nonpalpable malignant tumors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the interpretation of breast ultrasound with consideration of the mammography results where mammography has been performed. The clinical indication to perform both tests is a separate issue and has been discussed in other published work (1,3–6,8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the interpretation of breast ultrasound with consideration of the mammography results where mammography has been performed. The clinical indication to perform both tests is a separate issue and has been discussed in other published work (1,3–6,8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonography is more sensitive than mammography at detecting lesions in women with dense breasts910. However, ultrasonography does not detect most microcalcifications, which are the typical findings in ductal carcinoma in situ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the other studies to assess the use of additional imaging were done with symptomatic women or a combination of asymptomatic and symptomatic women and looked at the value of additional imaging with either a test set or as a retrospective review of specific cases [4,[37][38][39][40]. Most of the studies looked at the added value of ultrasound for detecting cancers, without looking at negative assessments or the effect of additional imaging on specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%