2019
DOI: 10.3233/rnn-180890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The addition of the MEP amplitude of finger extension muscles to clinical predictors of hand function after stroke: A prospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another cohort study, Katrak et al ( 1998 ) found that initial active shoulder abduction noted on average 11 days after stroke onset, predicted good hand movement at 1 month and hand function at 1 and 2 months. Bakker et al ( 2019 ) even found that the ability of patients to voluntarily extend the fingers within 4 weeks after stroke was strongly related to Fugl-Meyer (FM) at 26 weeks after stroke, with no false-negative results and no additional value of the motor-evoked potential amplitude of the affected finger extension muscle for this clinical predictor. More recent studies have developed algorithms (also based on the scoring of SA and FE movements) to predict an individual’s potential for UL recovery within a few months post-stroke (Stinear et al, 2012 , 2017b ) and 2 years post-stroke (Smith et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another cohort study, Katrak et al ( 1998 ) found that initial active shoulder abduction noted on average 11 days after stroke onset, predicted good hand movement at 1 month and hand function at 1 and 2 months. Bakker et al ( 2019 ) even found that the ability of patients to voluntarily extend the fingers within 4 weeks after stroke was strongly related to Fugl-Meyer (FM) at 26 weeks after stroke, with no false-negative results and no additional value of the motor-evoked potential amplitude of the affected finger extension muscle for this clinical predictor. More recent studies have developed algorithms (also based on the scoring of SA and FE movements) to predict an individual’s potential for UL recovery within a few months post-stroke (Stinear et al, 2012 , 2017b ) and 2 years post-stroke (Smith et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that while the functional integrity of the CST originating from the primary motor cortex of the damaged hemisphere is believed to be necessary for the execution of distal upper-limb movements (hand and fingers, including FE) after stroke onset (Brodal, 2016 ; Stinear et al, 2017b ; Bakker et al, 2019 ), the brain structures underlying the capacity to execute proximal movements, like SA, are less clear. Also, while the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from FE muscles early after stroke onset correlates with late FM scores, it was claimed that MEPs lack a significant added value for prediction of long-term hand function over and above the clinical prediction method (Bakker et al, 2019 ). This however might result from stimulation power being insufficient to activate functionally depressed but structurally preserved cortical motor neurons or reflect recovery processes based on structure-function re-mapping and network reorganization, involving brain systems that are not directly connected to the corticospinal pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, behavioral evaluation scales have been used as indicators of neurological recovery in animal models of CNS injury. The modified neurologic severity score 24 26 , the Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan locomotor scale method 6 , 10 , 11 , 27 29 , angle of inclined plane test 10 , 11 , 28 , 29 , and the Rotarod test 30 32 have been used as behavioral evaluation scales. While it is true that these behavioral evaluation scales can be measured easily, detailed quantification is difficult, whereas the evaluation of tcMEPs is quantified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcranial electrical stimulation MEP (tcMEP) is currently one of the most popular intraoperative pyramidal tract monitoring methods in clinical neurosurgery 1 , 2 , spinal surgery 3 , 4 , and aortic surgery 5 . Evaluating intraoperative motor function with tcMEPs often provides information on strategies to preserve postoperative motor function and evaluate patients following nerve injury (e.g., stroke or spinal cord injury) 6 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ademais se destaca que a população acometida por um episódio de AVC apresenta inúmeras complicações, de ordem motora (problemas na mobilidade, fraqueza muscular, parestesia, hemiplegia, equilíbrio prejudicado, alterações na marcha), emocional/afetiva (depressão), cognitiva (déficit cognitivo), entre outras, resultantes de alteração na perfusão cerebral [10]. Dentre estas, destacamos as alterações nos membros superiores, que atingem 33% a 70% desses pacientes, pelo seu forte impacto sobre as atividades de vida diária [11][12]. Associado a isso, há o alto risco de re-hospitalização precoce e institucionalização, com consequências adversas em termos de custos socioeconômicos [13].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified