TO THE EDITOR:We would like to congratulate Fuccio and colleagues (1) on their well-performed meta-analysis comparing different durations of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. However, we disagree with their conclusion that prolonging treatment is unlikely to be a clinically useful strategy. In our opinion, this statement is not supported by their results. The authors confirm previous findings (2, 3) that extending duration of treatment from 7 days to 10 or 14 days improves eradication rates, although the improvements in eradication rates (4% for 10 days and 5% for 14 days) were slightly lower than those previously reported (3% for 7 days, 8% for 10 days, and 12% for 14 days) (2, 3). They also found that extending treatment from 7 to 10 days increases efficacy in patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (relative risk difference, 11%) but not in patients with ulcer (relative risk difference, 2%) (4).We disagree with the conclusion for 3 reasons. First, it is based on a subanalysis of only 4 studies with high Jadad scale scores (5) that did not find statistically significant differences. Any subanalysis limited to 4 studies is likely to give negative results because of the small sample size and the consequent type II error; it cannot be used to argue for the lack of an effect. Second, their results show that the increase in eradication rates depends on the proportion of patients with nonulcer dyspepsia included in the meta-analysis. Therefore, the inclusion of 2 large studies dealing exclusively with patients with ulcer could only have led to an underestimation of the benefit of prolonging treatment. In fact, as we currently treat more patients with nonulcer dyspepsia than patients with ulcer, the benefit of lengthening duration of treatment is likely to be greater in clinical practice than Fuccio and colleagues' study suggests. Finally, eradication rates with triple therapy seem to be decreasing, and second-and third-line therapies often achieve suboptimal results as well. In this scenario, even a 4% to 5% increase in eradication rates is probably worth the greater cost, especially because there is no increase in side effects.In conclusion, we believe that the correct inference from the meta-analysis is that prolonging H. pylori treatment statistically significantly increases eradication rates. Whether it represents a clinically useful strategy remains a matter of opinion until new evidence emerges. 2. Calvet X, Ducons J, Bujanda L, Bory F, Montserrat A, Gisbert JP. Hp Study Group of the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología. Seven versus ten days of rabeprazole triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a multicenter randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1696-701. [PMID: 16086704] 3. Ford A, Moayyedi P. How can the current strategies for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy be improved? Can J Gastroenterol. 2003;17 Suppl B:36B-40B. [PMID: 12845349] 4. Zagari RM, Bianchi-Porro G, Fiocca R, Gasbarrini G, Roda E, Bazzoli F. Comparison of 1 and 2 weeks of omeprazole, amoxicilli...