2016
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The added value of C-reactive protein measurement in diagnosing pneumonia in primary care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
39
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, like many other clinical decision rules, it still left a group of patients classified at intermediate risk, in which clinical decision-making remains challenging. 9 This is very much in line with qualitative evidence showing that GPs sometimes struggle with intermediate results. 10 The current NICE guideline for pneumonia now advises physicians to consider a delayed prescription for patients with intermediate CRP values between 20 mg/L and 100 mg/L.…”
Section: The Impact Of Crp On Antibiotic Prescribing Decisionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, like many other clinical decision rules, it still left a group of patients classified at intermediate risk, in which clinical decision-making remains challenging. 9 This is very much in line with qualitative evidence showing that GPs sometimes struggle with intermediate results. 10 The current NICE guideline for pneumonia now advises physicians to consider a delayed prescription for patients with intermediate CRP values between 20 mg/L and 100 mg/L.…”
Section: The Impact Of Crp On Antibiotic Prescribing Decisionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It was identi ed as a predictor of pneumonia in several studies. [11,[20][21][22] A CRP level ≤ 10 mg/L was useful for ruling out CAP in most patients. [11]Steurer et al found there was no pneumonia diagnosed when the CRP levels were < 10 mg/L or if the CRP levels were between 11 and 50 mg/L and the patient did not complain of dyspnea and fever associated with cough.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortalidad a 30 días 0,53 0,43 -0,62 0,780 tabla 5. Evolución de la proteína C reactiva sérica a las 72 h de la admisión al hospital en la pesquisa de eventos adversos en pacientes adultos inmunocompetentes hospitalizados por neumonía adquirida en la comunidad falla en la declinación de la pCr sérica a las 72 h* los servicios de atención primaria, especialmente en aquellos que no tienen acceso a exámenes radiológicos [21][22][23][24][25] . En una revisión sistemática, el área bajo la curva receptor operador de la PCR sérica para confirmar el diagnóstico clínico de neumonía fue 0,80 (IC 95%: 0,75-0,85); con diferentes puntos de corte del examen, la sensibilidad (10-98%) y especificidad (44-99%) fueron muy variables 22 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En una revisión sistemática, el área bajo la curva receptor operador de la PCR sérica para confirmar el diagnóstico clínico de neumonía fue 0,80 (IC 95%: 0,75-0,85); con diferentes puntos de corte del examen, la sensibilidad (10-98%) y especificidad (44-99%) fueron muy variables 22 . La PCR sérica medida en los pacientes adultos atendidos por síntomas respiratorios agudos permitiría confirmar el diagnóstico clínico de neumonía y reduciría la prescripción inapropiada de antimicrobianos en los servicios de atención primaria 25 . En nuestro estudio, la PCR sérica elevada en la admisión al hospital permitió predecir el riesgo de neumonía bacteriémica.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified