1961
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1961.tb03142.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Adaptive Significances of Intraspecific Trends of Variation in Wing Length and Body Size Among Bird Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer tails are posited to allow for better maneuverability of predatory birds that pursue prey in relatively dense forested habitats (hamilton 1961, Wattel 1973, Mueller et al 1981. Our results seem to concur with this principle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Longer tails are posited to allow for better maneuverability of predatory birds that pursue prey in relatively dense forested habitats (hamilton 1961, Wattel 1973, Mueller et al 1981. Our results seem to concur with this principle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus, as an indicator of overall size of the birds, wing length conforms to Bergmann's ecogeographic rule with larger size in colder climates. However, this rule may be modified by relative heat loss by evaporation (James 1970), and by relative body water loss by evaporation (Hamilton 1958), resulting in larger size of birds in dryer climates (Ripley 1950 form of the vegetation may affect wing length independent of body size (Davis 1951;Pitelka 1951;Hamilton 1961;Rand 1961). More extensive flights and, thus, greater use of wings may be required to escape predators in more open habitats such as grasslands and deserts.…”
Section: Discussion Of All Wing Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Linsdale (1938) suggested that high winds in open country contribute to longer wings in the same way that flying great distances does. Also, populations with long migrations may require long wings (Behle 1942;Mayr 1956;Hamilton 1961), and such populations are usually the more northern ones (Appendix II), the non-migratory Aleutian populations being notable exceptions.…”
Section: Discussion Of All Wing Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This difference may be related to the fact that C. striatus occupies habitats in which there is closer spacing of vegetation, with the result that this species flies shorter distances. (See discussions of the relationship of density of vegetation and wing length by Miller, 1931;Pitelka, 1951;Hamilton, 1961;and Selander, 1964. ) In both sexes of C. striatus, but especially in the female, the tail is disproportionately longer in relation to body size than in C. aurifrons.…”
Section: Morphological Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 96%