The adaptive gain integrating pixel detector AGIPD a detector for the European XFEL

Henrich, B.; Becker, Julian; Dinapoli, R.; Goettlicher, P.; Graafsma, H.; Hirsemann, H.; Klanner, R.; Krueger, Hans; Mazzocco, Riccardo; Mozzanica, A.; Perrey, H.; Potdevin, Guillaume; Schmitt, B.; Shi, X.; Srivastava, A. K.; Trunk, U.; Youngman, C.

doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.107

Cited by 181 publications

(146 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

144

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Relative variations of II(n, t), ν(t), ξ r (t) and Λ(t) as well as the well dened wavelength Γ of transient collective undulations draw a consistent and conclusive picture of the non-equilibrium situation, see additionally gure 5.19: The observed 108 Laser induced structural dynamics intensity changes, which are brought about by creating rms-roughness and structural changes of the membranes at molecular scales, occur within the rst ≈ 100ns after excitation. The mesoscopic dynamical pathway is characterized by the formation of collective modes in response to the increased in-plane uctuation repulsion.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Non-equilibrium dynamics of lipid bilayers

Reusch¹

2013

Göttingen Series in X-Ray Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Non-equilibrium dynamics of lipid bilayers

Reusch¹

2013

Göttingen Series in X-Ray Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Some applications might greatly benefit from the implementation of particular selections of these techniques. [18] and subsequently by Keck-PAD [19], DSSC [20], AGIPD [21], and LPD [22]. ‡ Trade-offs could include: much larger pixels, design complexity, yield and cost.…”

Section: Increasing the Epix Readout Speedmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A number of detector developments target specifically the XFEL.EU bunch structure: AGIPD [21], DSSC [20], and LPD [22]; for a review see [6]. These use either analog or digital frame storage with read-out between bunches.…”

Section: Xfeleumentioning

confidence: 99%

Future of ePix detectors for high repetition rate FELs

Blaj¹,

Caragiulo²,

Carini³

et al. 2016

AIP Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Each pulse can measure a different crystal, and diffraction patterns can be measured at the pulse repetition rate, which so far has been up to 120 Hz. Detectors developed for such applications typically consist of several small detector modules tiled together to cover a larger area, for example the CSPAD detector [3,4], pnCCD [5], MPCCD [6], AGIPD [7] and Percival [8] detectors. Other segmented X-ray detector systems are either planned or under development, including detectors for synchrotron applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover large-area fast hybrid detectors are currently made from tiles due to the limited size of readout electronics [9]. Individual modules can be arranged in an offset manner surrounding a central hole through which the direct beam can pass [4,5,7], obviating the need for a beamstop, and may be movable so that the overall detector layout can be optimized for each experiment. However, movable modules introduce the necessity of determining the relative locations of each module with respect to the beam-sample interaction point each time the detector configuration is changed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accurate determination of segmented X-ray detector geometry

Yefanov¹,

Mariani²,

Gati³

et al. 2015

Opt. Express

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent advances in X-ray detector technology have resulted in the introduction of segmented detectors composed of many small detector modules tiled together to cover a large detection area. Due to mechanical tolerances and the desire to be able to change the module layout to suit the needs of different experiments, the pixels on each module might not align perfectly on a regular grid. Several detectors are designed to permit detector sub-regions (or modules) to be moved relative to each other for different experiments. Accurate determination of the location of detector elements relative to the beam-sample interaction point is critical for many types of experiment, including X-ray crystallography, coherent diffractive imaging (CDI), small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and spectroscopy. For detectors with moveable modules, the relative positions of pixels are no longer fixed, necessitating the development of a simple procedure to calibrate detector geometry after reconfiguration. We describe a simple and robust method for determining the geometry of segmented X-ray detectors using measurements obtained by serial crystallography. By comparing the location of observed Bragg peaks to the spot locations predicted from the crystal indexing procedure, the position, rotation and distance of each module relative to the interaction region can be refined. We show that the refined detector geometry greatly improves the results of experiments. #245734Received 17 Boutet, M. Messerschmidt, and I. Schlichting, "De novo protein crystal structure determination from X-ray freeelectron laser data," Nature 505(7482), 244-247 (2013). 23. M. Schmidt, K. Pande, S. Basu, and J. Tenboer, "Room temperature structures beyond 1.5 Å by serial femtosecond crystallography," Struct. Dyn. 2(4), 041708 (2015).

show abstract

The adaptive gain integrating pixel detector AGIPD a detector for the European XFEL

Cited by 181 publications

References 8 publications

Non-equilibrium dynamics of lipid bilayers

Non-equilibrium dynamics of lipid bilayers

Future of ePix detectors for high repetition rate FELs

Accurate determination of segmented X-ray detector geometry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About