The adaptive behavior scale-residential and community (part I): towards the development of a short form

Hatton, Chris; Emerson, Eric; Robertson, Janet; Gregory, Nicola; Kessissoglou, Sophie; Perry, Jonathan; Felce, David John; Lowe, Kathy; Walsh, Patricia Noonan; Linehan, Christine

doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(01)00072-5

Cited by 87 publications

(103 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

102

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This part of the survey collected data about participant characteristics, community inclusion, and formal support arrangements. It drew on the "People we support questionnaire" (Mansell et al, 2013) and included the short form of the Adaptive Behavior Scale Part I (ABS; Hatton et al, 2001), the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC; Aman, Burrow, & Wolford, 1995), the Index of Participation in Daily Living (Raynes, Wright, Shiell, & Pettipher, 1994), and the Choice Making Scale (Conroy & Feinstein, 1986). Open-ended questions were also included about support, tenancy, and living situation of participants.…”

Section: Data Collection Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia

Bigby

Bould

2017

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Supported living is perceived as more flexible than group homes for people with intellectual disability. This study identified costs and factors associated with quality of life (QOL) in supported living and compared this with group homes. Method: Thirty-one residents in supported living participated in a survey incorporating measures of service user characteristics and QOL. Participants in supported living were compared to a sample of 397 people in 96 group homes, and QOL outcomes compared for a matched sample of 29 people in supported living and group homes. Results: QOL differed little, supported living was cheaper, and 30-35% of both groups had similar support needs. Being younger, having autism, better health, family support, and participation in structured activities were associated with better outcomes in supported living. Conclusions: Supported living holds potential for group home residents, but greater support is required in domains such as health and interpersonal relationships.

show abstract

Section: Data Collection Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia

Bigby

Bould

2017

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Adaptive behaviour was assessed using the short form of the Adaptive Behaviour Scale (ABS), 80 which was completed by the service user's key worker or home carer.…”

Section: Participant Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In terms of adaptive behaviour, the mean short-ABS score of 86 converts to a full ABS score of 223, which is equivalent to the 75th percentile of people with intellectual disabilities living in residential or community care. 80 The majority of participants lived in the family home (41%) or in staffed/supported living arrangements (38%). The two groups were well matched on all demographic variables (see Table 10).…”

Section: Service Usersmentioning

confidence: 99%

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities

Willner

Rose²,

Jahoda³

et al. 2013

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report should be referenced as follows:Willner P, Rose J, Jahoda A, Stenfert Kroese B, Felce D, MacMahon P, et al. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive-behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities. Health Technol Assess 2013;17(21). This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/). Health Technology Assessment is indexed and abstracted inEditorial contact: nihredit@southampton.ac.ukThe full HTA archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hta. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Technology Assessment journalReports are published in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HTA programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors.Reviews in Health Technology Assessment are termed 'systematic' when the account of the search appraisal and synthesis methods (to minimise biases and random errors) would, in theory, permit the replication of the review by others. HTA programmeThe HTA programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined as all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care.The journal is indexed in NHS Evidence via its abstracts included in MEDLINE and its Technology Assessment Reports inform National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance. HTA research is also an important source of evidence for National Screening Committee (NSC) policy decisions.For more information about the HTA programme please visit the website: www.hta.ac.uk/ This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HTA programme as project number 08/53/34. The contractual start date was in May 2009. The draft report began editorial review in May 2012 and was accepted for publication in August 2012. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HTA editors and publisher have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ...

show abstract

“…the Adaptive Behavior Scale (SABS) Part I (Hatton et al, 2001) and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC; Aman, Burrow, & Wolford, 1995). Additional questions addressed characteristics such as gender, date of birth, and the presence of other disabilities.…”

Section: Service User Needs and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The reliability and validity of the ABS (from which the SABS was drawn) and ABC have been evaluated and reported as acceptable by their authors. A full-scale score for Part I of the Adaptive Behaviour Scale can be estimated from the SABS using the formula provided by Hatton et al (2001), and has been reported here.…”

Section: Service User Needs and Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measuring practice leadership in supported accommodation services for people with intellectual disability: Comparing staff-rated and observational measures

Bould

Bigby

Iacono

2016

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Method A subset of data from a longitudinal study regarding 29 front-line managers working across 36 supported accommodation services in Australia was used. An observed measure of practice leadership, based on an interview and observation of a front-line manager, was compared with ratings of practice leadership completed by staff. The quality of active support was rated after a 2-hour structured observation.Results Correlations between staff-rated and observed measures were nonsignificant. Only the observed measure was correlated with the quality of active support.Conclusions This study provides evidence to support using an observational measure of practice leadership rather than reliance on staff ratings.

show abstract

The adaptive behavior scale-residential and community (part I): towards the development of a short form

Cited by 87 publications

References 3 publications

Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia

Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia

A cluster randomised controlled trial of a manualised cognitive behavioural anger management intervention delivered by supervised lay therapists to people with intellectual disabilities

Measuring practice leadership in supported accommodation services for people with intellectual disability: Comparing staff-rated and observational measures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About