2020
DOI: 10.5455/apd.137794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The adaptation of the Triangular Relationship Inventory into Turkish: the study of validity and reliability for university students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total TRI's test-retest reliability was .76 in the original study (Bresin et al, 2017). Turkish TRI (Kurşuncu & Baştemur, 2020) produced a similar Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .88 to the original scale. Turkish TRI's test-retest reliability for university students was .80.…”
Section: Triangular Relationship Inventorymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Total TRI's test-retest reliability was .76 in the original study (Bresin et al, 2017). Turkish TRI (Kurşuncu & Baştemur, 2020) produced a similar Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .88 to the original scale. Turkish TRI's test-retest reliability for university students was .80.…”
Section: Triangular Relationship Inventorymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, the findings on scapegoating were not statistically significant. One reason might be the scapegoating subscale’s controversial psychometric properties regarding both the Turkish version of the TRI as well as the original TRI (Bresin et al., 2017; Kurşuncu & Baştemur, 2020); further examination is suggested by the authors of these studies. The second explanation concerns the worldviews of Turkish young adults and the Turkish cultural context, in which scapegoating may be perceived as culturally enmeshed with the cross‐generational coalition rather than existing in a unidimensional way by itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scores in all subscales are 6–30, and higher scores show higher triangling, with the exception of the balanced dimension (because of reversed coding, higher scores show less balanced triangling). Kurşuncu and Baştemur (2020) adapted the scale into Turkish; the Cronbach’s Alpha and McDonald’s coefficients for this version of the scale vary between .82 to .89, and .63 to .80 for test–retest reliability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Freedenthal et al [16] found higher levels of PB in men. Other studies could not confirm the gender differences [17][18][19]. In a study by Upegui-Arango et al [20] there were differences between clinical and non-clinical populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%