The ad format-strategy effect on comparative advertising effectiveness

Abstract

Purpose Extant research on comparative advertising has focused only on “market leader” comparisons (a brand targeting the market leader), whereas in the marketplace, “multi-brand” comparisons are more prevalent (Kalro et al., 2010). Moreover, most research focuses on direct comparisons only. Hence, this research aims to investigate the interplay between comparison ad strategy (“market leader”/“multi-brand” comparisons) and comparison ad format (direct/indirect comparisons) on the effectiveness of comparative advertising. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses four 2 × 2 fully crossed factorial designs (comparison ad format: direct vs indirect and comparison ad strategy: market leader vs multi brand) with established and new brands in two categories: powdered detergents and smart phones. All studies were conducted in metropolitan cities of India. Findings By and large, the experiments indicated that direct (indirect) comparisons lowered (heightened) perceived manipulative intent and enhanced (reduced) attitude-toward-the-ad for multi-brand (market leader) comparisons. Practical implications Findings suggest that when advertisers use comparative advertising, they may use direct ads when using multi-brand comparisons and use indirect ones when using market leader comparisons. It could also be argued that when advertisers use multi-brand comparisons because of fragmentation in the marketplace, they may directly compare against these multiple brands. When advertisers need to compare against a market leader, they may do so indirectly. Originality/value This research is among the first to investigate multi-brand comparisons that are widely used in the industry and that too in the context of both direct and indirect comparison formats.

Did clickbait crack the code on virality?

“…IMI have been shown to influence customers' attitudes and, ultimately, behaviors across a wide variety of contexts. For instance, the influence of IMI has been studied in servicescape and co-creation (Lunardo et al, 2016 ), customer service (Warren et al, 2020 ), comparative advertising (Kalro et al, 2017 ), advertising disclosure (V. L. Thomas et al, 2013 ), and even retail store atmospherics (Lunardo & Mbengue, 2013 ).…”

Analysis of Tweet Form’s effect on users’ engagement on Twitter

“…To figure out what kind of format of tweet can attract more customer engagement, a number of scholars have conducted researches on the qualitative analyses on users' engagement with regards to different advertising formats (Tutaj & Van Reijmersdal, 2012) (Kalro, Sivakumaran, & Marathe, 2017), but there are few studies on quantitative exploration for it and no quantitative findings show how different formats of tweet influence their customer engagements. Besides easily thinking the richer the content of tweet the better of its customer engagement or the simpler the better, there should be some customized strategy for a specific industry of the company.…”

A Structural Equation Modeling on Analysis of Preference Advertisement in Building Brand Equity

“…Another argument states that when there is high degree of competition among multiple brands as they are scattered in the market, advertisers generally employ direct comparisons with the competitors. (Kalro, D. A. 2015) Advertisers always design a careful and indirect communication while comparing with a market leader.…”