The Acute Effects of Prolonged Uninterrupted Sitting on Vascular Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the dose-response relationship between prolonged sitting and vascular function in healthy individuals and those with metabolic disturbances and to investigate the acute effects, on vascular function, of interventions that target interrupting prolonged sitting. Design: This is a systematic review with meta-analysis. Data Sources: Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched from inception to 4 December 2020. Eligibility Criteria: Randomized crossover trials, quasi-randomized trials, and parallel group trials where vascular function (flow-mediated dilation [FMD]) was assessed before and after an acute period of sedentary behavior was used in this study. Results: Prolonged sitting resulted in a significant decrease in the standardized mean change (SMC) for lower-limb FMD at the 120-min (SMC = −0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −1.32 to −0.38) and 180-min (SMC = −1.18, 95% CI = −1.69 to −0.66) time points. A similar pattern was observed for lower-limb shear rate. No significant changes were observed for any outcomes in the upper limb. Subgroup analysis indicated that prolonged sitting decreased lower-limb FMD in healthy adults (SMC = −1.33, 95% CI = −1.89 to −0.78) who had higher a priori vascular endothelial function, but not in those with metabolic and vascular dysfunction (SMC = −0.51, 95% CI = −1.18 to 0.15). Interrupting sitting with active interruptions increased the standardized mean difference for FMD, relative to prolonged sitting, but it was not statistically significant (0.13, 95% CI = −0.20 to 0.45). Conclusions: Lower-limb vascular function is progressively impaired as a consequence of prolonged sitting, up to 180 min. A similar trend was not observed in upper-limb vascular function. Subgroup analysis indicated that prolonged sitting negatively affects healthy populations, a finding not observed in those with metabolic disturbances. Regularly interrupting sitting with activity may be beneficial for those with metabolic disturbances.

Effects of physical activity breaks during prolonged sitting on vascular and executive function—A randomised cross-over trial

“… 10 , 28 , 40 However, the findings from laboratory studies remain mixed. 16 , 41 We did not observe significant adverse SFA arterial function during prolonged sitting visits or favourable SFA arterial outcomes with movement breaks of varied intensity during prolonged sitting. Although our findings were not statistically significant, prolonged sitting decreased the SFA diameter and flow.…”

A Privacy-Preserving Desk Sensor for Monitoring Healthy Movement Breaks in Smart Office Environments with the Internet of Things

“…Thus, a better solution is warranted to measure desk occupancy and, more importantly, how often employees interrupt their seated posture with standing to engage in a movement break during the workday. A current meta-analysis [ 35 ] suggests that seated employees should stand to take a movement break at least once every two hours during the workday to avoid vascular malfunction.…”

The behavioural epidemiology of sedentary behaviour in inflammatory arthritis: where are we, and where do we need to go?

“…Laboratory-based experimental studies examining the acute physiological responses to sedentary behaviour will address this need and provide important insight into the mechanisms underlying the links between sedentary behaviour and different inflammatory arthritis outcomes. To date, several mechanisms have been proposed to underlie the adverse relationship between sedentary behaviour and health in non-inflammatory arthritis research [ 28 ], including impaired vascular function [ 39 , 40 ] and decreased lipoprotein lipase activity (and clearance of triglycerides) [ 27 , 41 , 42 ], both of which might provoke deleterious reciprocal associations with systemic inflammation. Discussion of such mechanisms is beyond the scope of this review, but ultimately, experimental evidence suggests that adverse changes to these biological pathways can be attributed to the absence of skeletal muscle contraction during sedentary behaviour [ 27 , 28 ].…”