The Acute Effects of 2 Different Intensities of Resistance Exercise on Autonomic Function in Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Saeidi, Marzieh; Ravanbod, Roya; Shahi, Mohammad Hossein Pourgharib; Navid, Hosein; Goosheh, Babak; Baradaran, Abdolvahab; Torkaman, Giti

doi:10.14744/anatoljcardiol.2022.2282

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Saeidi et al observed that high-intensity resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise (75%1-RM) significantly increased 6MWD compared to low-intensity resistance exercise combined with aerobic exercise (50%1-RM), suggesting that higher exercise intensities should be judiciously considered in cardiac rehabilitation programs. 55 Another study indicated that, in comparison to high-intensity aerobic interval training or IMT alone, a combined intervention of high-intensity aerobic interval training and IMT markedly improved inspiratory muscle function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients. 56 …”

Section: Combined Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Different Exercise Modalities on Physical Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure

Li,

Chen,

Wang

2024

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Heart failure, a chronic condition, often manifests with reduced physical function and an overall decline in quality of life. It is considered critical that patients with heart failure recover as soon as possible; exercise training, which includes aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, inspiratory muscle training, traditional mind-body exercise, and combined training, facilitates this. The research progress on the impact of various exercise modalities on the physical function and quality of life of patients with heart failure is systematically reviewed in this article. The objective is to augment the understanding of healthcare personnel regarding the status of implementation and outcomes associated with varied exercise modalities. This endeavor seeks to provide a point of reference for the development of exercise rehabilitation programs tailored to individuals contending with heart failure.

show abstract

Section: Combined Trainingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Different Exercise Modalities on Physical Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure

Li,

Chen,

Wang

2024

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…High-intensity interval training induces improvements in cardiac output (CO), peak oxygen uptake (V ̇O2peak ), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), endurance capacity and endothelial function and leads to a decrease in pro-brain natriuretic peptide [7]. Resistance training entails improvements in muscle structure, O 2 convection, diffusion and utilization, decreases exercise intolerance [8] and induces favorable effects on the heart rate (HR) variability in CHF patients [9]. Finally, supervised exercise training leads to a decrease in total and cardiac mortality [10], increases quality of life and reduces hospital admissions of such patients [1].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hemodynamic Response to Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients

Kirsch,

Iliou,

Vitiello

2024

Cardiol Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Supervised exercise training decreases total and cardiac mortality and increases quality of life of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. However, response to training is variable from one patient to another and factors responsible for a positive response to training remain unclear. The aims of the study were to compare cardiac hemodynamic changes after an exercise training program in responders (R) versus non-responders (NR) HFrEF patients, and to compare different discriminators used to assess response to training.Methods: Seventy-six HFrEF patients (86% males, 57 ± 12 years) completed an exercise training program for 4 weeks. Patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a cycle ergometer before and after training. Cardiac hemodynamics were measured by impedance cardiography during CPET. The R and NR groups were classified using the median change in peak oxygen uptake (V ̇O2peak ).Results: There were statistically significant differences in V ̇O2peak (+35% vs. -1%, P < 0.0001) and in peaks of ventilation (+30% vs. +2%, P < 0.0001), cardiac output (CO peak ) (+25% vs. +4%, P < 0.01), systolic blood pressure (+12% vs. +2%, P < 0.05), diastolic blood pressure (+9% vs. +4%, P < 0.05) and heart rate (+8% vs. +1%, P < 0.01) between R and NR after the training program. V ̇O2peak was the best discriminator between R and NR (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) = 0.83, P < 0.0001), followed by CO peak (ROC AUC = 0.77, P < 0.0001). Conclusion:V ̇O2peak is the best discriminator between HFrEF R and NR patients after the training program. Responders showed improvements in peak hemodynamic parameters. These results pave the way for other studies to determine how the individualization of exercise training programs and peak hemodynamic parameters potentially linked to a better positive response status.

show abstract

The Acute Effects of 2 Different Intensities of Resistance Exercise on Autonomic Function in Heart Failure Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cited by 2 publications

References 29 publications

Impact of Different Exercise Modalities on Physical Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure

Impact of Different Exercise Modalities on Physical Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Heart Failure

Hemodynamic Response to Exercise Training in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About