2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30397-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Acute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool (ACCEPT): a modelling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be achieved through the use of nuanced clinical prediction models that rely not just on AECOPD history but on a multitude of other predictor variables. A recent risk prediction model for AECOPD has demonstrated that the use of easily verifiable patient characteristics can significantly improve the predictability of AECOPDs, especially severe ones (an improvement in c-statistics of 0.11 was observed in this study) [20]. With the availability of multidimensional data, one can move beyond easily verifiable predictors to include values from imaging (e.g., bronchiectasis), blood or sputum biomarkers (e.g., eosinophils), comorbidity from electronic charts, and others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This can be achieved through the use of nuanced clinical prediction models that rely not just on AECOPD history but on a multitude of other predictor variables. A recent risk prediction model for AECOPD has demonstrated that the use of easily verifiable patient characteristics can significantly improve the predictability of AECOPDs, especially severe ones (an improvement in c-statistics of 0.11 was observed in this study) [20]. With the availability of multidimensional data, one can move beyond easily verifiable predictors to include values from imaging (e.g., bronchiectasis), blood or sputum biomarkers (e.g., eosinophils), comorbidity from electronic charts, and others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Initial attempts using Deep Belief Networks and clinical factors have shown an accuracy of 92%, which is superior to prior attempts to predict exacerbations using support vector machine classifiers 67 . These kinds of approaches could augment and support more standard models that have been recently proposed from pooled clinical trials 68 .…”
Section: Diagnosis and Outcome Predictionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Overall, none of these models revealed to adequately predict exacerbations and are therefore not of clinical use [ 64 ]. Recently, the Acute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool (ACCEPT) was introduced to predict the individualized rate and severity of COPD exacerbations [ 65 ]. ACCEPT uses demographical and clinical variables, such as sex, smoking status, lung function parameters, and medication use, to estimate the 1-year exacerbation risk [ 65 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the Acute COPD Exacerbation Prediction Tool (ACCEPT) was introduced to predict the individualized rate and severity of COPD exacerbations [ 65 ]. ACCEPT uses demographical and clinical variables, such as sex, smoking status, lung function parameters, and medication use, to estimate the 1-year exacerbation risk [ 65 ]. This tool has significant limitations as it does not differentiate between the different biological exacerbation clusters, neither does it include biomarkers or enable individualized prediction and early identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%