1948
DOI: 10.1039/df9480400049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The activity of sulphur in liquid iron: the influence of carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1950
1950
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…diam., wall thickness, 0.01 in were used. 8 The crucible was supported on an alumina tube (Morgan Crucible Triangle RR Grade).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…diam., wall thickness, 0.01 in were used. 8 The crucible was supported on an alumina tube (Morgan Crucible Triangle RR Grade).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once carbon atom has dissociated from the graphite block, energetics does not play a significant role in its mass transfer in the melt. However, C and S atoms are strongly repulsive and tend to displace each other from their neighbourhood [21]. Whereas S moves deeper into the iron melt away from graphite, a locally increased concentration of S does not favour the presence of C. This in turn tends to slow down the diffusion of C in the Fe-C-S melt and adversely affects the rate of mass transfer for carbon.…”
Section: Graphite Dissolution Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attractive bond between Fe and S is very strong and is more or less ionic in nature. This strong Fe-S bond is capable of distorting the electron distribution around the Fe atom also affect other bonds made by it (Kitchener et al, 1948). In the event of such a distortion taking place, the resulting bond energy will be a fraction (1−ε) of the energy of the bond made in the absence of a Fe-S bond, with ε ranging between 0 and 1.…”
Section: Fe-c-s Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%