2014
DOI: 10.1039/c4cs00055b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The activation strain model and molecular orbital theory: understanding and designing chemical reactions

Abstract: In this Tutorial Review, we make the point that a true understanding of trends in reactivity (as opposed to measuring or simply computing them) requires a causal reactivity model. To this end, we present and discuss the Activation Strain Model (ASM). The ASM establishes the desired causal relationship between reaction barriers, on one hand, and the properties of reactants and characteristics of reaction mechanisms, on the other hand. In the ASM, the potential energy surface ΔE(ζ) along the reaction coordinate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
420
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 622 publications
(431 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
10
420
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5 is a schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbital interactions between the BCN and phenyl azide reactants in the transition state that emerge from our quantitative Kohn-Sham electronic-structure analyses. Activation-strain analyses 32 confirm that the overall orbital interactions indeed contribute ca À 35 kcal mol À 1 of stabilization, but that net interactions between the reactants in the TS are small, at most À 0.8 kcal mol À 1 , due to substantial Pauli repulsion between closed-shell orbitals on each of the two fragments. The dominant donor-acceptor orbital interactions are between the p electrons of BCN and the relatively low-energy LUMO of the azide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…5 is a schematic representation of the frontier molecular orbital interactions between the BCN and phenyl azide reactants in the transition state that emerge from our quantitative Kohn-Sham electronic-structure analyses. Activation-strain analyses 32 confirm that the overall orbital interactions indeed contribute ca À 35 kcal mol À 1 of stabilization, but that net interactions between the reactants in the TS are small, at most À 0.8 kcal mol À 1 , due to substantial Pauli repulsion between closed-shell orbitals on each of the two fragments. The dominant donor-acceptor orbital interactions are between the p electrons of BCN and the relatively low-energy LUMO of the azide.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…2, differs from the instantaneous interaction ΔE int as defined above, by ΔE strain . This is the energy needed to deform the box to adjust to the halide bonding (30). These terms are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computed PESs along the reaction coordinate ζ were further analyzed using the activation strain model (ASM) [11,[40][41][42] in order to obtain insight into how the activation barriers arise.…”
Section: Activation Strain Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%