1983
DOI: 10.1016/0014-3057(83)90096-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The activation of MgCl2-supported ziegler-natta catalysts: A structural investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in the case of supporting the active transition metal on MgCl 2 with low surface area, the resulting catalyst gives very low activity. Thus MgCl 2 is modified to increase the specific surface areas for high activity [12][13][14][15][16] , contrary to SiO 2 support 17) . From this point, the rate enhancement in the present supported catalyst is probably due to the formation of the increased surface areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the case of supporting the active transition metal on MgCl 2 with low surface area, the resulting catalyst gives very low activity. Thus MgCl 2 is modified to increase the specific surface areas for high activity [12][13][14][15][16] , contrary to SiO 2 support 17) . From this point, the rate enhancement in the present supported catalyst is probably due to the formation of the increased surface areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. (a) Scheme of the stacking sequence of pentasil layers, drawn according to Kokotailo & Meier (1980). Bergozza & Fichera, 1983;Giunchi & Allegra, 1984), all the layers within one crystal will be assumed to have the same rectangular shape and size, in order to optimize their packing energy. Furthermore, to minimize the lateral crystal surface, no significant shift between distant layers will be admitted parallel to the layer plane.…”
Section: Stacking Of the Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As concerns a possible comparison between the disorder affecting /?-MgCl 2 and the one introduced by ball milling in the α-form, it can be observed that, while in /?-MgCl 2 each structural layer affects the relative position of the first and second neighbouring layers, in the ground α-form the sphere of influence extends only to the first neighbours (Galli et al, 1983). It is rather difficult to go beyond this remark in order to find a satisfactory explanation: probably an accurate study of such a difference among the statistical models describing the two forms should involve both cohesive energy calculations and the investigation of the growth kinetics of /f-MgCl 2 and of the stacking faults introduced by ball milling into a-MgCl 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MgCl 2 is normally used as support in the crystalline a-modification (Montedison, 1969;Galli, 1983), but recently a new ß-form has been described as concerns both its structure and the activity in some catalytic processes (Montedison, 1977;Spitz et al, 1984). As pointed out in recent works (Makhtarulin et al, 1978;Gerbasi et al, 1984) the support structure is of prime importance in determining the catalyst performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%