2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The activation of interactive attentional networks

Abstract: Attention can be conceptualized as comprising the functions of alerting, orienting, and executive control. Although the independence of these functions has been demonstrated, the neural mechanisms underlying their interactions remain unclear. Using the revised attention network test and functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined cortical and subcortical activity related to these attentional functions and their interactions. Results showed that areas in the extended frontoparietal network (FPN), includi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
113
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
17
113
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending these findings, neuroimaging work involving a revised version of the ANT (i.e. ANT-R; Fan et al, 2009) showed that activation of the LC was selectively related to the alerting response (Xuan et al, 2016). Given this association between alerting and the LC-NE system, the present findings are suggestive of an arousal-mediated influence of incentives on attention, consistent with adaptive gain theory (Aston-Jones & .…”
Section: Phasic Arousal Incentives and Agingsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Extending these findings, neuroimaging work involving a revised version of the ANT (i.e. ANT-R; Fan et al, 2009) showed that activation of the LC was selectively related to the alerting response (Xuan et al, 2016). Given this association between alerting and the LC-NE system, the present findings are suggestive of an arousal-mediated influence of incentives on attention, consistent with adaptive gain theory (Aston-Jones & .…”
Section: Phasic Arousal Incentives and Agingsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It is conceptualized to rely on both brainstem projections and right fronto-parietal regions (Petersen & Posner, 2012). Findings from previous neuroimaging studies report associations with these regions, in addition to bilateral thalamus, temporoparietal junction, ACC, anterior insula, and IPS (Fan, McCandliss, Fossella, Flombaum, & Posner, 2005; Xuan et al, 2016). The orienting network enables selective attention of external stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It thus also oversees the ability to disengage attention from one stimulus and attend to another. Prior imaging studies have largely supported these neuroanatomical substrates (Fan et al, 2005; Xuan et al, 2016; Yin et al, 2012). Thus while conceptually distinct, the underlying neural regions supporting the alerting and two orienting networks are somewhat overlapping, particularly with regards to the intraparietal sulcus, temporoparietal junction, and frontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Notably, increased modulation was evident in core regions of the executive attention network including the middle frontal and cingulate gyri, the basal ganglia and the thalamic nuclei (Visintin et al, 2015; Xuan et al, 2016), but not in regions that lie in core motor sub-networks (including regions such as the primary-, pre- and supplementary motor cortices); 2) The degree of “hyper”-modulation varied as a function of the sensorimotor demands of the task. During random epochs, where the task demands induced greater attention processing by virtue of the unpredictable demands of the task, dACC hyper-modulation was more pronounced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%